Wed, Jan 23, 2019
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications

The Golden Years are over - how to deal with volatility and crowdedness: Opalesque Roundtable

 

Sign up here for our free Roundtable Scripts - get this unique intelligence by email as Opalesque publishes them:

Asset allocators have had some golden years behind them. Fixed income and equities had negative correlations to each other, so blending them together gave low volatility in client portfolios. Both asset classes had great returns in 2013 and 2014. Now correlations are moving up. The first hint of that was in May-June 2013, with the Fed tapering, and again last April when yields started to rise in Europe.

When looking back at the years 2008 and 2011, years when markets were down by more than average, those were years alternative funds had to demonstrate their value added. Looking at 2015, this could be another one of those years. Everything started quite well, but most indices have now given up their yearly gain and gone into negative territory.

The Volatility Dilemma

Summer 2015 can potentially be seen as the first hiccup caused by rising rates. Clearers and exchanges like volatile markets as this brings more transaction opportunities for traders and investors, and volumes can double. But if volatility becomes too high, like in August, it becomes challenging for almost all investors and managers. Going into a month like that being completely long volatility is also difficult and very costly. Still, for a volatility fund like Mint Tower, August 2015 was a “textbook” month and the fund made money. But in general, most alternative managers should be able to outperform in years like this...

How to recognize a crowded trade

...Provided they don't get stuck with the crowd. The risk for crowdedness in markets has gone up a lot. Some of the trades that look obvious for people to take positions in become very quickly crowded, and crowded positions are actually the worst to be in, in highly volatile times, because they get unwound the fastest. So typically in areas where most of the market focuses on at such a point of time, you can also suffer the biggest pullbacks. This can be a very dangerous dynamic: things that are in the news attract so much attention, and so much positioning and very quick trading, and this can make the market more treacherous. Read on to learn how Gerlof de Vrij from Blenheim Capital tries to identify a crowded trade.

Can risk management make markets riskier?

Everything with a high yield, high carry, high roll-down, and low volatility, can turn out to be a minefield for investors, despite the “low” risk. The Swiss Franc and then the Chinese yuan were examples where people assume they can count on a presumed base or risk level, but then that suddenly breaks. And because those people had scaled their positions on short-term, historic volatility measures, they often get completely burned. Read on to learn what successful managers do instead.

The Opalesque 2015 Netherlands Roundtable was sponsored by ABN AMRO Clearing and Eurex, and took place September in Amsterdam with:

  1. Gerlof de Vrij, CEO/CIO, Blenheim Capital Management BV
  2. Jelte de Boer, Portfolio Manager, Optimix
  3. Willem de Vlugt, Partner, EValuation Capital Management
  4. Wilrik Sinia, Partner, Mint Tower Capital Management
  5. Gildas LeTreut, Head of Prime Services, ABN AMRO Clearing
  6. Cornelius Müller, Institutional Sales, Eurex / Deutsche Börse
The group also discussed:
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. News Briefs: The Jeff Bezos divorce: $136bn and Amazon in the middle, Bridgewater Associates partners with consulting firm, Cyprus no longer Mediterranean haven for Russian businesses, Goldman Sachs on course to launch cash management in mid-2020[more]

    The Jeff Bezos divorce: $136bn and Amazon in the middle From Mint: The announcement by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, the world's wealthiest man, and his wife that they will divorce has captivated the imagination -- how will they split his giant fortune, estimated at $136 billion? And what wi

  2. Institutional Investors: Institutional investors plot large property allocations, Qatar Investment Authority aims to reach $45bn in U.S. investments, Louisiana Teachers assigns $200m, SoftBank move to slash WeWork investment sends shockwaves[more]

    Institutional investors plot large property allocations From FT: Institutional investors plan to make large allocations to property in 2019, taking them closer to their desired targets. At least €72.4bn of new capital is expected to flow into real estate this year, according to a

  3. Legal: Attorney sues after Tampa hedge fund goes under, Hedge funds showing increased interest in litigation claims, Argentina sued again by hedge fund on bonds tied to GDP growth[more]

    Attorney sues after Tampa hedge fund goes under A Tampa hedge fund company may be in legal trouble after the firm that was holding its money was sued by a lawyer who claimed "gross negligence" caused the fund to lose tens of millions of dollars. James Cordier, the head of optionseller

  4. Activists: MGM hands board seat to activist hedge fund Corvex's Meister, PG&E shareholder BlueMountain challenges bankruptcy plans, Gulfport pledges share buybacks after hedge fund demand, PPG Paints itself into a corner[more]

    MGM hands board seat to activist hedge fund Corvex's Meister From Reuters: MGM Resorts International has struck a deal with hedge fund Corvex Management's founder, Keith Meister, to give him a board seat, one week after a rival activist investor was seen building a position in the casino

  5. Opinion: Can you beat Warren Buffett's investment returns using data?[more]

    From Seeking Aplha: The ideal hedge fund portfolio would use leverage to take a variety of uncorrelated risks that all cancel each other out, leaving the fund with little to no net exposure. For example, if you could invest in enough items with no correlation to the business cycle, like earthqua