•  
• Tweet
•  
•        Print
•  
•         Track Keywords
•  
• 

Matthias Knab, Opalesque:

AlphaBetaWorks writes on Harvest Exchange:

Our earlier articles discussed how some smart beta strategies turn out to be merely high beta strategies and how others actively time the market.

We also showed that, for the majority of smart beta ETFs, returns are mostly attributable to the traditional dumb Market and Sector Factors. Consequently, the absolute performance of most smart beta strategies can be substantially captured by sector rotation. We received questions about these studies' focus on absolute performance: The attribution of absolute performance to the Market and Sector factors tells little about tracking error and relative variance. Perhaps smart beta volatility is attributable to dumb factors, but smart beta tracking error is not?

This article addresses the above criticism and analyzes smart beta tracking error rather than (absolute) volatility. The results hold: Though some smart beta ETFs do provide valuable exposures to idiosyncratic factors, most primarily re-shuffle basic dumb factors. Whether one considers their absolute or relative performance, most smart beta equity ETFs are largely sector rotation strategies in disguise. Consequently, investors and allocators must guard against elaborate re-packaging of dumb factors as smart beta and perform rigorous sector and industr......................

To view our full article Click here