Sat, Dec 20, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Futures Lab: New priorities in asset allocation and due diligence, from Welton Corp.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009


Post-Crisis Asset Allocation

With the painful experience of 2008 in mind, institutional investors seek ways to build portfolios that will stand up better to potential market stresses. Many are looking for alternatives that will help protect their portfolio in times of turbulence.

“Traditional asset allocation models did not properly account for the actual risks embedded in portfolios,” says a recent report from Morgan Stanley. “These risks include liquidity shocks, correlations that change over time and uncertain cash flow requirements.” Investors have started to question the validity of traditional asset allocation models, according to the Morgan Stanley report.

Due diligence questionnaires are increasingly reflecting investors' new priorities. The following discussion, an edited and abridged version of material from Welton Investment Corp., highlights the critical issues and argues that global macro and managed futures fit the evolving asset allocation paradigm.

Carmel, California-based Welton specializes in managed futures and global macro strategies. The firm's flagship Global Directional Portfolio, a diversified collection of strategies, had about $500 million in assets as of year-end 2008 and is a component of the FTSE Hedge CTA/Managed Futures Index. The program has compounded annualized returns of over 17% since inception in June 2004 through 2008.

For an in-depth interview with founder Dr. Patrick Welton, please see the June 2nd, 2009, issue of Opalesque Futures Intelligence.

A 2008 internet survey of institutions and financial advisors examined the perception and use of alternative investments. Participants in the survey, sponsored by Morningstar and Barron's, identified five basic asset allocation criteria for alternatives (Table 1).

TABLE 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Five Criteria for Alternatives

Performance Traits:
  • Absolute return orientation
  • Diversification

Qualitative Traits:

  • Liquidity
  • Transparency
  • Regulation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

This list is elegant in its simplicity. It provides welcome clarity for investors revisiting their asset allocation strategy. We believe this is a robust framework, which if put into practice would have curbed many of the problems that emerged in 2008, ranging from counterparty risk, lack of transparency, excessive leverage, over-exposure to equity Beta and fraud as highlighted by the Bernard Madoff scandal.

The questions in Table 2 apply these criteria. It is remarkable how well managed futures fits the bill. Take the central question of which alternatives provide the most reliable diversification. Managed futures is one of the most diversifying strategies, with low correlation not only to major markets but also most hedge fund strategies. (See Opalesque Futures Intelligence February 10, 2009, p. 6.) Global macro is another highly diversifying investment.

TABLE 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due Diligence Using New Criteria

1. Absolute return orientation

  • Is the strategy bi-directional (long and short) or does it make bets in a single direction and perform only under certain market conditions?
  • How does the strategy perform during stress periods? Bull markets? Bear markets?

2. Diversification

  • Is the strategy non-correlated to dominant asset classes like equities? To other alternatives?
  • Are there many sources of return (diversified) or only a few (concentrated)?

3. Liquidity

  • Are the instruments themselves liquid or are they thinly traded?
  • Is the investment time commitment short (i.e., liquid) or long (i.e., illiquid)?
  • Do the manager's terms include lockups or gates?

4. Transparency

  • Are managed account structures available?
  • Is there third-party custody of assets?
  • Are the instruments traded easily valued (e.g., marked-to-market) eliminating valuation uncertainty?
  • Is the strategy free from borrowing requirements or is leverage required for the strategy to succeed? If so, how much borrowing is needed and is this transparent?

5. Regulation

  • Is the manager regulated?
  • Are the instruments the manager trades regulated?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moreover, futures are traded in regulated markets and easily marked to market. It is fair to say that managed futures has a long history of satisfying the investment criteria that investors use today when evaluating alternatives. There can be no question that the strategy warrants a permanent allocation within a well diversified institutional portfolio. Appropriate allocation size will vary by investor, but as investors re-emphasize diversification, estimates like more than 25% of assets are mentioned.

Surprisingly, however, in recent years investors have allocated heavily to less diversifying alternatives, in particular long/short equity and event-driven strategies. These correlate strongly with the stock market. As of 2008, equity hedge and event driven together accounted for half of all hedge fund assets (based on data from HFR and BarclayHedge).

By comparison, only 28% of industry assets were in the two strategies that proven diversifiers, global macro and managed futures. The predominance of less diversifying strategies in portfolios led to unexpected correlation and large losses in 2008.

But equity-correlated strategies were not always so dominant in alternatives portfolios. Historically, investors allocated much more to macro and managed futures, with over 52% of assets in these two strategies in 1990. That share declined over time. Now, with investors' priorities changing, asset allocation targets for macro and managed futures should increase. That would be a return to the earlier pattern.



 
This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Investing - Big hedge funds win again on PetSmart, Riverbed, RBS sells real estate loans to hedge fund Cerberus, Talisman energy speculation: Which hedge funds could benefit?[more]

    Big hedge funds win again on PetSmart, Riverbed From CNBC.com: Another week, another set of wins for activist investors. On Sunday, pet supply retailer PetSmart agreed to the largest leveraged buyout of the year at $8.7 billion. Hedge fund firm JANA Partners had been pushing for a sale a

  2. Outlook - Hedge fund manager who remembers 1998 rout says prepare for pain, Bond guru Bill Gross predicts U.S. economic growth to dip to 2%[more]

    Hedge fund manager who remembers 1998 rout says prepare for pain From Bloomberg.com: Stephen Jen landed in Hong Kong in early January 1997 as Morgan Stanley’s newly minted exchange-rate strategist for Asia. He was soon working around the clock when investors began targeting the region’s

  3. Investing - Hedge funds get boost from healthcare in 2014, Paulson & Co takes stake in Salix on heels of inventory issues[more]

    Hedge funds get boost from healthcare in 2014 From Valuewalk.com: The healthcare sector started the year on a turbulent note, as stocks of many major biotechnology companies were battered. However, most of the players in this sector have bounced back. The BarclayHedge Healthcare & Biotec

  4. Opalesque Exclusive: U.S. legal receivables fund launched in August[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva for New Managers: Investing in asset-backed receivables is a strategy that has been an integral part of the alternative investment space within the overall fixed income asset c

  5. Comment - High fees and low performance hit hedge funds[more]

    From FT.com: Disenchantment over high fees and lackluster performance may finally be turning the tide against hedge funds, fresh data suggest. Despite generally weak returns since the global financial crisis, hedge funds have enjoyed positive net inflows every year since 2010. This helped assets und