Sat, Apr 18, 2015
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Futures Lab: Read about investors’ new priorities in the post-crisis commodity markets. Commodity trading advisors stand to become the preferred way to invest but need better tools for risk control, argue the authors of a report from Celent.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Post-Crisis Model for Commodity Investing

We present edited excerpts from a report on commodity markets from Celent, the consulting firm. This report makes an intriguing point. Managed futures stands to become the preferred way to invest in commodities because of concerns raised by the financial crisis, argue authors Ranjit Behera and Sreekrishna Sankar, analysts at Celent Bangalore.

The commodity trading advisor model has always existed as a choice for investors but it was overshadowed by the hedge fund model, Sreekrishna Sankar told us. However, he says now that investors have realized certain critical issues in the hedge fund model, it will be easier for CTAs to raise money and managed futures assets will grow faster than before.

As the summary below makes clear, this is a qualified prediction—CTAs will need better tools to manage risk and tailor portfolios to investor needs. And the assets will flow to well-established managers with track records, so it won’t be easy for small and new firms to raise capital. Even so, this analysis points to a larger managed futures industry with greater opportunity for all.

“Though established CTAs will attract the bulk of the new capital, new CTAs can make a mark in growing sectors like emissions and freight trading.”

“Investors have already started to move towards exchanges in search of more transparency and to minimize counterparty risk.”

The 2000s saw rising demand for commodities from emerging economies, capital infusion from players who invest in commodities for returns (rather than for hedging) and phenomenal growth in trading on exchanges. A rally began in 2002, accelerated and continued until mid-2008.

Commodities attracted investment from all segments of the financial world. The major players were pension funds, mutual funds, insurance companies, hedge funds, commodity trading advisors and the proprietary desks of various investment banks. They brought financial and technological sophistication to the market.

By 2008, the global commodities market stood at $15.3 billion, with 85% of the transactions happening in the over-the-counter market (see chart).

Commodities were heavily affected by the financial crisis. Investors un-levered their positions because of the credit contraction. Even as the credit crisis eased via monetary intervention, the problem transformed into an economic crisis. This led to a drop in demand and a slowdown in world trade, suppressing commodity prices. Commodity indices and the prices for crude oil, agriculture-based commodities and metals fell rapidly.

For most financial players involved in commodity markets, huge losses seem to have been the norm. This is especially true for hedge funds, which were hit due to their high leverage. Some were forced to shut down. However, broker-dealers made decent money from the trade volume surge as many players tried to profit from the volatile markets.

One asset class that performed extremely well during this phase was managed futures. To put the relative performance into perspective, in 2008 commodities as an asset class lost about 24% and hedge funds as a whole lost around 20%. Meanwhile, CTAs gained more than 18%.

A major profit-reaping mechanism for hedge funds was leveraging in the OTC markets. That approach to profiting from commodities might well become history as governments look at the risks taken by funds and move to correct the lack of transparency. A new regulatory regime has appeared on the horizon.

We will discuss how the commodity market game will pan out in the crisis aftermath and which investment vehicles are better equipped for handling the changes.

Investment Flows

Investing a portion of a portfolio in commodities provides an opportunity for diversification. Investors will continue to seek this mode of diversification, and investments by financial players like insurance companies, pensions and others could reach over $2 trillion.

This table shows the impact of commodity investing via managed futures on a stock portfolio. The data indicates the smoothing effect of commodity investments on the overall portfolio, with decreases in both volatility and downside deviation.

World Stocks With and Without Managed Futures

January 1994 through November 2008
  World Stocks80%WS/20%MFChange
Return2.99%4.11% 1.12
Downside deviation11.278.74–2.53

In terms of assets under management, pension funds are the largest segment of commodity investors – with total assets of around $30 trillion under their control – followed by mutual funds. Big pension funds like CalPERS and BT Hermes have been active investors in the commodity market. Banks’ treasury departments have also made forays into commodity investments.

For most players commodities are a recent addition to their portfolio and hence form a small portion of total assets.

The industry consensus is that a 3% to 5% portfolio exposure to commodities will be ideal for diversification. On a conservative estimate, a 3% asset exposure of major buy-side players may result in $2.4 trillion of investments into commodities over time.

CTAs as Model for the Future

Investors routing money into commodity markets via hedge funds are asking for more transparency and real time investment data. Demands for independent third-party valuation of the portfolio and analysis of risk are also on the rise.

CTAs fit the bill perfectly for providing better information on investments as well as greater liquidity for withdrawals. Hence CTAs could be seen as a preferred means to get exposure to the commodity market.

Moreover, CTAs have long been regulated. We believe that CTAs’ transparency and adherence to regulatory norms helped them weather the crisis and will make them a model for commodity investing in the post-crisis era.

But their 2008 favorable performance on its own will not be enough to significantly lure investors. CTAs will have to adapt to the newer compliance regimes and upgrade risk management systems. They will have to work more closely with their clients to understand the risks that are important for each client.

There is already a trend in this direction. CTA offerings have been evolving to address investors’ demands for products tailored to reduce risk. Many CTAs try to uncover investment opportunities to best suit the clients’ concerns. This trend intensified after the slump in the commodity market.

CTAs will need better tools to assess the risks and better ways to mitigate them. They have to rapidly upgrade their technology to accommodate greater trading traffic. Viable technologies need to be developed to accommodate alternative trading systems.

The managed futures industry is fragmented. There are more than a thousand CTAs operating, with $160 billion managed in commodity-related futures. The increased flow of money should give enough breathing space for all to survive, though players with proven track records will attract the bulk of new investment.

New CTAs wishing to enter the market will have to struggle, since most investors prefer managers with established records. Though established CTAs will attract most of the new capital, new CTAs can make a mark in growing sectors like emissions and freight trading.

Move to Exchanges

Around 85% of commodity transactions occur on the OTC market because big commodity hedgers and investors preferred customized contacts. Owing to this high tilt towards OTC, some commodity transactions are not completely transparent and price discovery has become a major issue. The 2008 plunge in commodity prices created doubts regarding the kind of deals happening OTC and the motive behind them.

A big issue now is counterparty risk minimization. It is very likely that there will be a migration of buy side players towards avenues with lower counterparty risk, and thus volumes on exchanges will increase once the market recovers from the crisis.

Though the OTC market is comparatively large, transactions on exchanges have grown rapidly in recent years. Investments in commodity exchanges can be done via index funds or directly via derivatives. Index investments give investors exposure to multiple commodities at the same time.

The rise in index investing has resulted in higher trading volumes on exchanges globally. Both developed and developing countries actively participate in commodity trading. Over 40% of commodity trading on exchanges was carried out on US exchanges, followed by 26% in China, 17% in the UK and 7% in India.

Trading on exchanges in China and India has gained importance in recent years due to the emergence of these countries as significant commodities consumers and producers. Most exchanges concentrate on a couple of sectors. For example, the bulk of the trading on NYMEX is in energy and metals, whereas Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange of China is predominately agro based.

While exchanges barely form 15% of the commodity market, their role as price indicators has been crucial. Post crisis, exchanges and clearinghouses are expected to take a greater role. Investors have already started to move towards exchanges in search of more transparency and to minimize counterparty risk.

Since CTAs have always traded listed contracts, they face little counterparty risk and are well positioned to meet investors’ demand that exchange-listed instruments be used. By contrast, it will be a change for many commodity hedge funds to rely on exchanges and major clearinghouses. Hence managed futures is the right model on this score as well.

This table summarizes the points we’ve made.

Future of Commodity Investing

AttributeBefore the CrisisFuture
Preferred type of TransactionOpaqueHigher transparency
Preferred marketOTCExchanges/OTC with Clearinghouse
Preferred modelHedge fund/index investingCTA, newer models
Preferred strategy Passive/Active Active
Risk management and complianceModerate focusPrime focus
Source: Celent

This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Tiger Global falls 2.9% in March, down 5.3% in Q1[more]

    From Investment firm Tiger Global Management, one of the hedge fund industry's most closely watched players, told clients that its hedge fund lost 5.3 percent during the first quarter, an investor said on Wednesday. Much of the decline came in March when the fund lost 2.9 percent,

  2. It’s not just hedge funds—IMF study finds stability risks from ‘vanilla’ funds[more]

    From Leveraged hedge funds and banklike money-market funds are the parts of the asset-management industry most associated with risks to financial stability. But a report from the International Monetary Fund suggests that “plain-vanilla” mutual funds and exchange-traded funds also ca

  3. Hedge funds gain 2.4% in Q1 driven by currency and commodity markets[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds posted positive results last March to conclude a strong first quarter, with performance driven by strong macro trends in currency and commodity markets, complemented by broad-based gains and positioning in event driven, equity hedge and fixed income-b

  4. Hedge funds looking to continue their rally in Q2[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds finished the first quarter on a strong note and are looking to continue the rally in the second quarter, said Lyxor Asset Management in its Weekly Brief. The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index is up 0.4% over the week

  5. Hedge funds down -0.17% in March (+1.23%YTD)[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The hedge fund industry produced an aggregate return of –0.17% in March to end Q1 2015 up 1.23%, compared to the S&P 500 which increased 0.96%, according to the latest data from eVestment. Hedge fund performance returns were mixed in March amid increased equity