Wed, Sep 24, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Practitioner Viewpoint: Managers offer their perspective on how to turn market volatility into opportunity

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Practitioner Viewpoint

Turning Volatility into Opportunity

Several managers offer their perspective on current markets and how to take advantage of changing conditions.

Walt Gallwas and Jeff Malec of Attain Capital:
Managed futures as an asset class has been mostly treading water thus far in 2009, while traditional assets continue their freefall (table below). Investors have a perception problem about the flat returns in managed futures—we just came through one of the best periods of all time, and with that fresh in mind, it is only natural to want the period of greatness to continue along indefinitely. That's just not realistic.

There could be a technical reason for the flat performance. Many programs use some form of market volatility to size their trades and determine how many contracts of each market to trade for an account they manage. In a simple example, if a market has a range of 10 points normally, and you wish to risk 30 points per trade, you could do three contracts in that market (30/10 = 3: risk/volatility = contracts). Now, if the range of that market, which many managers equate to the possible loss or risk in that market, shoots up to 30 points, the manager may only do one contract (30/30 = 1).

This works fine and well most of the time, when the market movement is roughly equal to the amount the market is moving on average over the past x number of days. But something unique happened since about mid-December through the end of February. That something is a risk/reward mismatch of sorts, where the potential positive return many CTAs plan on decreased because the average move of the markets they track has roughly been cut in half since the volatility peaks in October and November, while the average range which includes that period has remained high.

In this scenario, trades are being placed now with risk based on the highly volatile period, but profit potential is only based on the now lower market moves, which are much smaller than they were back at the peak of the crisis. This mismatch will work itself out in the normal course of business for systematic programs as the algorithms used to measure volatility put more and more weight on recent market conditions

Most observers agree that we're not out of the woods in terms of volatility by a long shot. And that should be a good thing for managed futures programs once the risk/reward mismatch outlined above works itself out.

Asset Class Comparison

 YTD Return*
Hedge Funds1.09%
Cash 0.28%
Managed Futures(-)0.73%
Bonds(-)3.21%
Commodities(-)3.42%
US Stocks(-)18.62%
Real Esate(-)36.58%

* As of 2/27/09 (1/31/09 for Hedge Funds)
Managed Futures = Credit Suisse/Tremont Managed Futures Index, Cash = 3 mo T-Bill rate, Bonds = Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, Hedge Funds = Credit Suisse/Tremont Hedge Index, Commodities = Reuters/CRB Commodity Index, US Stocks = S&P 500 Index, Real Estate = Dow Jones Wilshire Real Estate Securities Index

Ty Andros of TraderView:

Volatility will be with us in spades during 2009. As currencies gyrate, investors will run all over the place trying to escape the maelstrom, driving values of stocks, commodities, bonds, energy and other markets up and down.

In 2008, the currency markets offered some of the greatest opportunities. Every currency had substantial moves and many times both up and down, as de-leveraging and stampedes of panic swept through the markets at different times. 2009 will be no different.

Governments are implementing stimulus plans that don't stimulate, they just consume precious capital. The “Obamination” $920 billion stimulus bill is an 88% permanent expansion of government (new and permanent baseline budget increases and expanded entitlements without the revenues to pay for them) and only a 12% token real investment that will pay itself back from productivity gains. Of course, the $900 billion understates all the costs. Have you ever heard of a government spending item that comes in for less than projected?

When looking at currencies, it is important to note that most currencies are actually IOU's from morally and fiscally bankrupt governments. Central bankers want to inflate away debts aggressively. Look for the Swiss franc, US dollar and Japanese yen to be strong as borrowers scramble to pay off their debts and convert the home currency into the currency in which they originally borrowed (yen, dollar, Swiss franc).

Once this is done, look for the dollar to reverse probably mid-year and head radically lower. The Swiss will stay stronger, as will the yen; they do not face the money printing requirements in which the US will indulge.

James Mahnke of Shield Plus LLC:
Investors need a long term, protected strategy that capitalizes on commodity volatility. A fully-covered, market-neutral strategy with net long option exposures in energy and other raw material markets should meet that need for long term investors.

Such a market-neutral approach combines two opposing positions, such as a long put & long call, and may make money as one position's gain more than offsets the other's loss regardless of market direction. (Typically, a long call makes money when commodity prices rise, and a long put appreciates when prices decline).

This market-neutral return profile, having the capability to potentially make money regardless of market direction, gives staying power to the investor. Who knows when the commodity market will spike or collapse? You just want the opportunity to make money when commodities move.



 
This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges 19 investment firms and one trader for breach of Rule 105[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started a push to enhance the enforcement of Rule 105 of Regulation M last year to uncover hedge funds and private equity firms that have illegally participated in an offering of a stock after short selling it duri

  2. Outlook - Julian Robertson: There are two bubbles that can bite us[more]

    From Businessinsider.com: Legendary hedge fund manager Julian Robertson gave a warning about two bubbles that could "bite us" at Bloomberg Market's Most Influential Summit. "I agree with the fact that the economy is definitely getting better. I think the cause of that is two bubbles that will

  3. Fund managers, bullish on Europe, anticipate monetary policy separation of Fed and ECB[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: At least 202 fund managers with $556bn of assets under management said that while the European Central Bank (ECB) has eased its monetary policy that sent sentiments towards Europe to pick up, the Fed is expected to hike its rate in the spring of 2015. Investor

  4. Institutions - North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds, UK pension fund criticizes hedge fund fees[more]

    North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds From Forbes.com: The State Employees Association of North Carolina this afternoon called on state Treasurer Janet Cowell to withdraw all investments in hedge funds, which appear to amount to approximately $6 b

  5. News Briefs - Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes, Just one week left until NYC's Rocktoberfest[more]

    Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes On September 5, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Chief Counsel Advice 201436049, concluding that members of an investment manager were subject to self-employment taxes with respect to their e