Sat, Sep 20, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Insider Talk: Christopher Jones of Diamond Peak Capital, a fund of funds firm, has been investing in CTAs via managed accounts. He shares his experience and insights.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Insider Talk

An Investor's Experience with Full Transparency

After the Bernard Madoff affair and frozen redemptions in the 2008 crisis, many investors do not want to be in a commingled fund and prefer to have a separate account that provides full transparency. With raising capital as hard as it is, even the largest hedge fund managers have become more willing to manage separate accounts.

Christopher Jones, founder of Diamond Peak Capital with Steve Sapourn, has experience using managed accounts to control risk and invest with emerging managers as well established managers. Here he shares his insights. Mr. Jones was previously at Sapourn Financial and Dekker Capital and was involved with quantitative futures trading. He oversees his portfolio while living by the beautiful Lake Tahoe.

Diamond Peak's CTA- and futures-focused multi-strategy portfolio was one of a small group of fund of funds that made money in 2008. The company started in October 2007 and returned 8.7% in its first fifteen months.

Opalesque Futures Intelligence: Why do you invest via managed accounts?

Christopher Jones: Investing through managed accounts is a core part of our business model. There are situations where a managed account is not feasible and we decide to invest in a pool, but ultimately we don't want limited partnership investments in our portfolio. We want to be a fund of managed accounts.

OFI: In terms of your portfolio, does having a separate account make a significant difference?

CJ: Unquestionably, it makes a big difference. You have 100% transparency with a managed account. Any time during the trading day you can access your account and see what's going on. We use sophisticated risk management software to import daily position data, usually direct from the Futures Commission Merchant or broker. With that information, we manage our portfolio a lot more effectively than we could otherwise.

OFI: How does having managed accounts change your risk controls?

CJ: One can look at the portfolio in a much more detailed way. If we see a risk imbalance in a certain area or sector risk is escalating across managers, we have the option to hedge by putting on a short or long position to offset that risk. This model has been corroborated by how unpredictable and volatile markets have been over the past 18 months. Since starting our fund, we've had positive returns in 70% of the months, despite this being the most challenging environment in living memory. I don't think we could have managed risks as well without the transparency provided by managed accounts.

OFI: What strategies do you invest in?

CJ: We're focused on trading strategies, not exclusively commodity trading advisors. We're willing to look at managers in any space. But we've invested more with CTAs because they tend to be directionally oriented and quantitative, which is also our orientation. Plus, we like them in the current environment. In times of major economic dislocation they tend to perform better.

OFI: Why do they do better in times of turmoil like last year?

CJ: Part of the reason is that many of them follow short or long-term trends and in the recent past there have been strong trends to follow. Also, there are now so many different, tradable futures markets, they can be less exposed through broader diversification than, say, long/short equity managers who trade fewer asset classes.

OFI: Are there other reasons you concentrate on CTAs?

CJ: Futures markets are very liquid. We don't want to be in anything that's hard to trade or value. We want to be able to liquidate the portfolio within a couple of hours if need be, not have to wait weeks or months. And we pass on the liquidity to our investors. Our strong intention is that they won't have to face gates or other barriers to redeeming their hard-earned capital.

OFI: Do quantitative traders have an advantage?

CJ: We gravitate to quantitative traders because in our experience they are more apt to do well over long time periods. Then we watch to make sure they stay in the strategy we invested in. The real-time trading has to match our range of expectations. Abnormally large positions or discrepancies in trades versus the strategy raise a red flag. That's reason to call the manager and have a talk. Investing through a separate account allows us to do that.

OFI: When you invest with managers in other countries, where are the accounts located?

CJ: We hold accounts in the US. We have trades occurring on foreign exchanges or markets but our FCM or brokerage accounts are in the US.

OFI: Do you provide seed capital?

CJ: We don't typically invest with a manager on day one after his launch, but we do invest with emerging managers. We're not afraid of emerging managers because we're investing via managed accounts. It's another advantage that we can take on potential risk with a relatively new manager because we have aggressive daily oversight of the trading. There's in fact not much more risk for us than is the case with established managers. But we typically don't seed traders within our fund. An ideal candidate for us is someone who has been trading for many years but is perhaps starting a new program. If the person has a strong background and most importantly has shown the ability to make money, we may invest at a very early stage.

OFI: What is important for you besides a trader's track record?

CJ: You can't just go by a long track record—any strategy can stop working at any time! A manager may end up with too much AUM for the strategy, or lose the edge due to changing markets. One manager we know with a great 10-year record could not handle the massive volatility swings in 2008 and did much worse than you'd expect from the history. Managers with short records served us better, for various reasons. We watch the trading day by day. The daily return stream is what matters for tight risk management.

OFI: Are newer managers more on their game?

CJ: Emerging managers tend to be hungrier and more focused compared to someone who's already sitting on a large pool of assets, earning hefty management fees. Also, capacity is an issue. Managers will tell you they won't take on too much AUM, but if they do well and institutional investors discover them, they end up overwhelmed with assets. Often that dilutes their return stream. They go from $200 million to $800 million and suddenly they no longer make the double-digit returns they made before. With the transparency we have, we're comfortable investing with newer managers.



 
This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges 19 investment firms and one trader for breach of Rule 105[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started a push to enhance the enforcement of Rule 105 of Regulation M last year to uncover hedge funds and private equity firms that have illegally participated in an offering of a stock after short selling it duri

  2. Fund managers, bullish on Europe, anticipate monetary policy separation of Fed and ECB[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: At least 202 fund managers with $556bn of assets under management said that while the European Central Bank (ECB) has eased its monetary policy that sent sentiments towards Europe to pick up, the Fed is expected to hike its rate in the spring of 2015. Investor

  3. Institutions - North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds, UK pension fund criticizes hedge fund fees[more]

    North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds From Forbes.com: The State Employees Association of North Carolina this afternoon called on state Treasurer Janet Cowell to withdraw all investments in hedge funds, which appear to amount to approximately $6 b

  4. News Briefs - Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes, Just one week left until NYC's Rocktoberfest[more]

    Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes On September 5, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Chief Counsel Advice 201436049, concluding that members of an investment manager were subject to self-employment taxes with respect to their e

  5. Institutions - Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move Advisers weigh in on CalPERS’ decision, Gina Raimondo sees no reason to follow California’s lead, exit hedge funds, Danish pension funds step up 'alternative investments'[more]

    Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move From WSJ.com: Financial advisers who use hedge funds in their clients' portfolios say they aren't rethinking that approach after a huge California pension fund announced plans to exit the hedge-fund market. The decision by the Cali