Sun, Oct 4, 2015
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Futures Lab: A study by Andrew Lo and Amir Khandani showed a surprising result for managed futures returns.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Andrew Lo

Liquidity and a Premium?
By Chidem Kurdas

This is a brief review of a surprising result from a working paper by Andrew Lo and Amir Khandani. Professor Lo is both a practitioner of managed futures and a professor of finance at MIT as well as director of MIT's Laboratory for Financial Engineering. He is the author of numerous academic papers and books, including Hedge Funds: An Analytic Perspective.
In 1999 he founded AlphaSimplex Group, now a subsidiary of Natixis Global Asset Management. He is co-portfolio manager of ASG Managed Futures Strategy Fund, a trend-following mutual fund launched in 2010, and of ASG Global Alternatives, a mutual fund that trades futures and forwards to obtain a similar return to a diversified portfolio of hedge funds.
The paper we draw on is titled "Illiquidity Premia in Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis of Hedge Funds, Mutual Funds, And US Equity Portfolios". This highly technical article may not be everybody's cup of tea, but the findings include an intriguing result regarding returns from managed futures-namely that they carry a premium associated with illiquidity in other types of investment.

It should be noted that the study as a whole is not about managed futures and the particular finding reported here happened to show up in an analysis of liquidity-we are focusing on only a small part of the overall research.

Managed futures is one of the most liquid investments. One way of measuring this is by comparing redemption notice periods, shown for selected hedge fund sectors in the table below. The average withdrawal notice for managed futures is orders of magnitude shorter than that for all other strategies.

Hedge Funds' Redemption Notice Periods (averages, in days)



Fund of funds


Convertible arbitrage


Fixed Income Arbitrage


Long/short equity hedge


Emerging Markets


Global Macro


Managed futures


SOURCE: "Illiquidity Premia in Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis of Hedge Funds, Mutual Funds, And US Equity Portfolios" working paper by Lo and Khandani.

Professor Lo has investigated this topic for some time. In previous studies he and others showed that autocorrelation (or serial correlation) is an indicator of the degree of liquidity-see references. Serial correlation means returns are predictable from earlier returns, a pattern not expected in an efficient market but explained by the presence of illiquidity.

Illiquid investments like private equity are typically autocorrelated. By contrast, managed futures returns have no significant autocorrelation-in other words, they're not predictable, an indication of high liquidity.

Illiquidity, like other risks, requires compensation. As expected, illiquid strategies have large risk premiums. For instance, Lo & Khandani estimate that convertible arbitrage has a risk premium of 9.9%.

Managed futures, being highly liquid, should not have any illiquidity premium. Surprisingly, Lo & Khandani find that managed futures returns do contain a premium of 4.9%. They suggest there is significant variability in liquidity among managed futures funds. But the study does not focus on explaining this finding.

Whether managed futures still earns a risk premium is unclear. Lo & Khandani's hedge fund data is for the 30-year period from 1986 to 2006. It is possible that this result does not extend beyond that period. But it is intriguing that there is an illiquidity premium built into the returns from a very liquid investment. It sounds like having your cake and eating it, too.

Lo, A., 2001. "Risk Management For Hedge Funds: Introduction and Overview", Financial Analysts Journal, 57, 16-33.

Getmansky, M., Lo, A., and I. Makarov. 2004. "An Econometric Model of Serial Correlation and Illiquidity in Hedge Fund Returns", Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 529-609.

This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Performance - Hedge fund moguls Einhorn, Loeb, Rosenstein lose money in September, Risky strategy sinks small hedge fund[more]

    Hedge fund moguls Einhorn, Loeb, Rosenstein lose money in September From Billionaire stock pickers David Einhorn, Daniel Loeb and Barry Rosenstein on Wednesday told their wealthy investors they lost money in September as market turmoil inflicted more pain on some of America'

  2. Opalesque Exclusive: IRAs represent billions of untapped capital for hedge funds[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Retirement accounts might not be the first source that comes to mind for those looking to raise funds, but they may represent billions of untapped capital. Unlike traditional retirement accounts,

  3. Opalesque TV: One way to access market hedge funds in the EU under the AIFMD radar[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: While the Cayman Islands, the US and Hong Kong await the pan-European marketing passport to be extended to alternative investment fund

  4. Investing - U.S. biotech bloodbath hits hedge funds but some bargains emerge, Computer-driven hedge funds betting on further stock selloff[more]

    U.S. biotech bloodbath hits hedge funds but some bargains emerge From A seven-day selloff of U.S. biotechnology stocks has hit sector investors - especially hedge funds - hard. But some managers say it was overdone and are already eyeing bargains such as Gilead Sciences Inc

  5. Vilas’ equity long bias hedge fund generates market-beating results[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The Vilas Fund, an equity long bias fund managed by Chicago, Illinois-based Vilas Capital Management, posted five-year annualized returns, net of fees, of 23.47% vs. 15.87% for the S&P 500 Index, including divid