Tue, May 3, 2016
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Index Tracker: Long commodities vs. managed futures: what the indexes say.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Long Commodities vs. Managed Futures

In the previous section, Ira Kawaller argues that long-only commodities do not on the whole add to a portfolio's return over the long term. This is an ongoing debate of increasing importance as long-only commodity index investments grow.

As far as index data goes, long commodities make big returns at times and big losses at other times. The past few months demonstrated this. In September, the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index gained 9.4%, but that was after losing almost 5% in August. By contrast, managed futures returns were solid for both months (Chart 1). One notices hat managed futures is less volatile and tends to vary within a narrower range.

CHART 1 Long Commodities vs. Managed Futures in Recent Months

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September August
Dow Jones Credit Suisse Managed Futures 2.8% 4.9%
DJ-UBS Commodity Index 7.3% -2.6%
S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index 9.4% -4.9%

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Look back over the years and you see a similar pattern. A long-only commodity index like the S&P GSCI can make the outsized gains, like the 33% it returned in 2007. Managed futures indexes do not show that kind of profit even in very good years, although individual CTAs can have very high returns.

On the other hand, the S&P GSCI went down by 47% in 2008, while managed futures proved its ability to act as a hedge in a market downturn (Chart 2).

The key issue is preserving capital. Long-only commodities lose so much in bad years, an investor that stays with a commodity index-based fund has less capital to take advantage of the surges. Not so with a diversified portfolio of managed futures programs. Losses are muted - so more of a long-term investor's capital is preserved for making money when market conditions favor the strategy.

CHART 2



 
This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Hedge funds see $14.3bn outflows in Q1, CTAs and multi-strategy lead net inflows[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The hedge fund industry saw net outflows of investor capital in the first quarter of the year, totaling $14.3bn, data from Preqin showed. This continues from the $8.9bn overall net outflows that funds recorded in Q4

  2. Third Point calls Q1 "catastrophic" for hedge funds[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The first quarter of this year was rocky for hedge funds based on aggregate performance from the industry, but now we are beginning to hear what the managers thought of it as quarterly letters make their way to investors. Dan Loeb, CEO of New York-based $17 bill

  3. Asia - Stabilization of China's capital outflows may hinge on Janet Yellen, Fink says China to do well this year as bubble threat postponed, Chinese hedge fund to invest in India’s infrastructure[more]

    Stabilization of China's capital outflows may hinge on Janet Yellen From Bloomberg.com: Whether China’s recent stabilization of its currency and capital outflows continues -- or downside pressure reignites -- may hinge in large part on Janet Yellen. If the Federal Reserve chair sticks to

  4. …And Finally - After all, judges are human too[more]

    From Newsoftheweird.com: In March, one District of Columbia government administrative law judge was charged with misdemeanor assault on another. Judge Sharon Goodie said she wanted to give Judge Joan Davenport some files, but Davenport, in her office, would not answer the door. Goodie said once the

  5. Comment - Unmasking the men behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's renegade blog[more]

    From Bloomberg.com: Colin Lokey, also known as "Tyler Durden," is breaking the first rule of Fight Club: You do not talk about Fight Club. He’s also breaking the second rule of Fight Club. (See the first rule.) After more than a year writing for the financial website Zero Hedge under the n