Thu, May 25, 2017
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

Practitioner Viewpoint: Cranwood Capital’s Ferenc Sanderson questions the conventional pigeonholing of investment strategies.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009


This viewpoint is from Ferenc Sanderson, chief operating officer of Cranwood Capital Management LLC. He points out the problems that can be caused by the conventional pigeonholing of investment styles.

Cranwood is an interesting example of a fund that straddles categories. Increasingly, fund managers are using futures to implement strategies that are not classified as managed futures. Conversely, many commodity trading advisors overlap with global macro. Welton Investment Corp., featured in this issue, is a case in point, spanning managed futures and global macro.

Before he joined Cranwood, Mr. Sanderson was senior hedge fund analyst at Lipper and a research fellow attached to Columbia University’s Program on Alternative Investments. Earlier in his career he was director of research at Daiwa Securities America.

Beware of Labels

“The bucket you are put into has an important bearing on how investors perceive you.”

Hedge fund strategy labels can be deceptive, as became clear last year. What were supposed to be distinct strategies turned out to be quite similar. The experience suggests that investors should pay closer attention to what a manager is actually doing and not take the strategy description at face value.

In 2008 this was exposed in a dramatic way, in widespread style-drift. The indices for all hedge fund categories correlated at record high levels (often over 0.8) with the price of oil and other commodities as well as with the MSCI World Index. Even multi-strategy single-manager returns demonstrated similarly high correlations to oil and stocks.

That means that one way or another everyone was following the same trade, namely going short the financials and long oil. That was the trade du jour. But in the summer of 2008, the trade blew up. So almost everyone suffered losses, regardless of the size of the firm, whether it had a well developed infrastructure or how deep its talent pool was.

Such crowded trades plus style drift explain what happened as everyone played the same beta movements. There were $10 billion managers going down alongside $10 million managers.

The point is that investors’ portfolios turned out to be a lot less diversified than you would expect from the standard strategy descriptions. Only now do institutional investors and other allocators realize the mistakes that were made.

My own experience is another example of how misleading labels can be. Cranwood pursues a fixed income arbitrage strategy, focusing on mean-reversion along the US interest rate curve. But we execute this strategy exclusively with futures contracts using butterfly spreads. So in a sense we fall into the CTA and managed futures allocation bucket.

Some investors pigeonhole us under the broader fixed income arbitrage label, mixing what we do with mortgage-backed securities, corporate or junk bond instruments. But our instruments are liquid, exchange-listed and devoid of heavy leverage or counter-party risk issues.

Since we trade only futures, you could consider us a managed futures fund. But then, our risk/return profile may be more consistent and substantially less volatile other managed futures funds which tend to be more directional and trend following. Moreover, we stay in our niche in interest rates and do not blend financial, commodity or currency futures.

Good News

The bucket you are put into has an important bearing on how investors perceive you. They may be looking for certain characteristics that they associate with certain strategies. For instance, today the majority of investors want trading oriented strategies that have liquidity, focus on exchange-traded instruments, do not employ a lot of leverage and are not susceptible to counterparty risk.

So it is important for a manager to clearly explain what he’s doing and just as important for the investor to understand the characteristics of the fund.

Investors can probably understand more clearly a manager's underlying strategy, instruments and risk factors when honing in on specialist alpha generators. In many cases, the risk factors of these niche/specialist managers can be defined, whereas managers that pursue a broader mandate might be subject to the same kinds of style drift and crowded trades many suffered from in 2008.

The reality is that people tend to go with what they know, or have been accustomed to doing, so it is no wonder that a blind reliance on traditional labels continues to dominate manager search and initial screening.

The good news is that academic researchers are increasingly moving away from self-defined strategy labels to more objective descriptors of fund performance and returns. It is only a matter of time before the whole lexicon of investment categories changes.



 
This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Investing - Tudor Jones backs AI hedge funds, Massive hedge fund trades highlight insider buying: GE, Pentair, Tempur Sealy, Apollo Global and more, Hedge funds big wigs are buying consumer and selling tech, here's the stocks[more]

    Tudor Jones backs AI hedge funds From FT.com: Hedge fund magnate Paul Tudor Jones has invested in a brace of artificial-intelligence powered "quantitative" hedge funds, underscoring the increasing acceptance that the industry will need to turn more to technology and away from traditional

  2. Soon hedge fund investors won't bet on a man, they will bet on a machine[more]

    From Forexlive.com: The Wall Street Journal is in the midst of a 17-part series that looks at the rise of quant funds. The AUM and money invested in quant funds still trails traditional asset managers but the gap is closing. What's truly amazing is volume. Quant funds make up 27% of trading vo

  3. Investing - China's HNA wants to invest in Value Partners, Risk parity investors reap rewards from rebalancing act, SoftBank's $100 billion tech fund rankles VCs as valuations soar[more]

    China's HNA wants to invest in Value Partners From Reuters.com: HNA Group has alighted on a logical, if pricey, target in Hong Kong. The deal-hungry Chinese travel conglomerate known for overpaying wants to invest in Value Partners, one of Asia's few sizeable independent asset managers,

  4. Opalesque Exclusive: Investors warm to ESG, but seek standardization[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: Asset managers and asset owners plan to double their investment in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) driven strategies over the next two years, according to a survey from BNP Paribas Securities Services. The report, "Great Expectations: ESG - what's nex

  5. J.P. Morgan Asset Management launches ultra-short income ETF[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: J.P. Morgan Asset Management, the $1.5tln investment management arm of JPMorgan Chase & Co., has launched the JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST), an actively managed ETF that seeks to provide current incom