Mon, May 4, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

Other Voices: FCA’s PS13/3: Retail investors unwelcome in Unregulated Collective Investment Schemes

Friday, June 14, 2013

This piece was contributed by Oliver Lodge of UK based Owl Regulatory Consulting.

Whatever our hazy recollections of the good old days, there never was a time when regulators were relaxed about the promotion of unregulated collective investment schemes. Twitchy might be the best description; paranoid might be another, but that would not be entirely fair. Damage has been done with CISs and it has usually been through the unregulated version. The industry is not beyond criticism, either for its management of the funds or for the way that they have been promoted. And the same can be said for animals that were not CISs, but looked remarkably like them. So it’s hard to say that this (FCA’s new rules published in PS13/3) is OTT. And even the dying breed that cleaves to caveat emptor will recognise that investors were significantly misled on numerous occasions.

But none of that quite explains the prominence that UCIS hold in the hierarchy of legislation. The banishment of the funds is enshrined in the Financial Services & Markets Act itself. Does that demonstrate high-level, even parliamentary, concern or is it just legal mechanics? Probably a bit of both, noting, of course, that financial promotion is not a regulated activity and is therefore open to the unwashed. But the impact has been striking. Once launched in legislation, the issue flows down into two Statutory Instruments and into the regulator’s Handbook too. A......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges funds of hedge funds Alpha Titans, executives, and auditor for improper expense allocations[more]

    Update: Please note the important updated information at the end of the article.The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against a Santa Barbara, Calif.-based hedge fund advisory firm and two executives involved in improper allocations of fund assets to pay undisclose

  2. Swiss group Pictet releases first public annual and financial reports[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Pictet Group, a Swiss private bank, has just released its first public annual report and financial report since it opened for business in Geneva in 1805. I

  3. Opalesque Exclusive: Carne establishes non-EU ManCo in Jersey[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: For those managers who will not domicile their fund in the European Union (EU) and yet want to distribute it in the EU – especially the UK –, going under the wing of an AIFMD-compliant ManCo on the Channel Islands could be one of the ways to do it. Ch

  4. Opalesque TV: Aequam Capital: Asset management industry will be mainly quantitative going forward[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Before starting his boutique in 2010, Arnaud Chretien, co-founder and CIO of Aequam Capital, worked ten years as a market trader and 18 years as a quantitative and systematic fund manager for Soc

  5. Class-action lawsuit accuse hedge fund Standard General of holding American Apparel hostage[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: A shareholder class-action suit filed on Wednesday accused New York-based hedge fund Standard General of holding American Apparel hostage. It would reportedly reap huge benefits if the clothing company declared bankruptcy. Standard General is the controlling sto

 

banner