Sun, Apr 19, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
New Managers November 2012

Peter Urbani' Statistics - Missed opportunities by large managers

This month we look at the performance of the Equity Long and Short Picks by the top 696 large hedge funds represented in the Goldman Sachs VIP Hedge Fund Index during Q3 2012.

Goldman Sachs calculates both Long Basket and Short Basket VIP Indices. Both Indices contain 50 stocks. Weights in the Long Basket are proxied by the frequency with which the stocks appear in the top 10 holdings of the underlying universe of hedge funds. Weights in the Short Basket are proxied by the $ Value of the shorts. The results are published quarterly by Goldman Sachs in their Quarterly Hedge Fund Trend Monitor.

For the purposes of this article we have used the Goldman Sachs data derived from 13F Filings and recalculated the results using both the above-mentioned weighting system and an equally weighted long and short basket. We assume Longs and Shorts are matched with both accounting for 50% of the overall Long Short Portfolio.

In addition, we also calculate the Portfolio Opportunity Distribution (POD) for each of the baskets. The POD method is a methodology popularised by Ron Surz and can be thought of as a Monte Carlo simulation of possible portfolios and returns built from the same underlying selection universe but with random weights. The distribution of Portfolio returns generated by this method represents the range of possible portfolios that might have eventuated from the same selection universe or Opportunity set had different weights been used.

What the findings show for Q3 is fairly unequivocally that the Long positions taken by the underlying managers were generally better than those of the broader underlying market as proxied by the S&P500. However, most funds did not reach the potential returns that the PODs indicated were availabl......................

To view our full article please login

This article was published in Opalesque's New Managers a top-down monthly analysis, news and research publication on the global emerging manager space.
New Managers
New Managers
New Managers

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Tiger Global falls 2.9% in March, down 5.3% in Q1[more]

    From Reuters.com: Investment firm Tiger Global Management, one of the hedge fund industry's most closely watched players, told clients that its hedge fund lost 5.3 percent during the first quarter, an investor said on Wednesday. Much of the decline came in March when the fund lost 2.9 percent,

  2. It’s not just hedge funds—IMF study finds stability risks from ‘vanilla’ funds[more]

    From MarketWatch.com: Leveraged hedge funds and banklike money-market funds are the parts of the asset-management industry most associated with risks to financial stability. But a report from the International Monetary Fund suggests that “plain-vanilla” mutual funds and exchange-traded funds also ca

  3. Hedge funds gain 2.4% in Q1 driven by currency and commodity markets[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds posted positive results last March to conclude a strong first quarter, with performance driven by strong macro trends in currency and commodity markets, complemented by broad-based gains and positioning in event driven, equity hedge and fixed income-b

  4. Hedge funds looking to continue their rally in Q2[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds finished the first quarter on a strong note and are looking to continue the rally in the second quarter, said Lyxor Asset Management in its Weekly Brief. The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index is up 0.4% over the week

  5. Hedge funds down -0.17% in March (+1.23%YTD)[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The hedge fund industry produced an aggregate return of –0.17% in March to end Q1 2015 up 1.23%, compared to the S&P 500 which increased 0.96%, according to the latest data from eVestment. Hedge fund performance returns were mixed in March amid increased equity

 

banner