Mon, Oct 5, 2015
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
New Managers July 2012

Peter Urbani' Statistics: Intra-Horizon Value at Risk

Intra-Horizon Value at Risk (VaR-I) - An idea whose time has come

During the recent financial crises, many financial institutions suffered losses much larger than their Value-at-Risk (VaR) models predicted and found that traditional end-of horizon risk measures are inadequate for managing longer-term risks.

There has been a considerable amount of literature on the measurement of financial risk; however, almost all the existing risk measures, either the popular Value-at-Risk (hereafter VaR) or expected shortfall (hereafter ES), mainly focus on quantifying the possible large losses at the end of the predetermined time horizon. This focus may be appropriate when dealing with short-term risks such as those mandated by the Basel Banking Committee.

But, this risk measurement methodology is inadequate for measuring longer-term risks, since it does not take into account the "intra-horizon risk," i.e. the possibility that the losses incurred before the end of the specified time horizon might trigger other problems such as position rebalancing, early liquidation, or margin calls.

So far there have been only three main papers studying the measurement of intra-horizon risk: Kritzman and Rich (2002), Boudoukh et al.(2004), and Bakshi and Panayotov (2010).

The standard VaR approach considers only terminal risk, completely ignoring the sample path of portfolio values. In reality interim risk may be critical in a mark-to-market environment. Sharp declines in value may generate margin calls and affect trading strategies. Boudoukh introduced the notion of MaxVaR, analogous to VaR in every way except it quantifies the probability of seeing a given loss on or before......................

To view our full article please login

This article was published in Opalesque's New Managers a top-down monthly analysis, news and research publication on the global emerging manager space.
New Managers
New Managers
New Managers

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Performance - Hedge fund moguls Einhorn, Loeb, Rosenstein lose money in September, Risky strategy sinks small hedge fund[more]

    Hedge fund moguls Einhorn, Loeb, Rosenstein lose money in September From Billionaire stock pickers David Einhorn, Daniel Loeb and Barry Rosenstein on Wednesday told their wealthy investors they lost money in September as market turmoil inflicted more pain on some of America'

  2. Opalesque Exclusive: IRAs represent billions of untapped capital for hedge funds[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Retirement accounts might not be the first source that comes to mind for those looking to raise funds, but they may represent billions of untapped capital. Unlike traditional retirement accounts,

  3. Opalesque TV: One way to access market hedge funds in the EU under the AIFMD radar[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: While the Cayman Islands, the US and Hong Kong await the pan-European marketing passport to be extended to alternative investment fund

  4. Investing - U.S. biotech bloodbath hits hedge funds but some bargains emerge, Computer-driven hedge funds betting on further stock selloff[more]

    U.S. biotech bloodbath hits hedge funds but some bargains emerge From A seven-day selloff of U.S. biotechnology stocks has hit sector investors - especially hedge funds - hard. But some managers say it was overdone and are already eyeing bargains such as Gilead Sciences Inc

  5. Vilas’ equity long bias hedge fund generates market-beating results[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The Vilas Fund, an equity long bias fund managed by Chicago, Illinois-based Vilas Capital Management, posted five-year annualized returns, net of fees, of 23.47% vs. 15.87% for the S&P 500 Index, including divid