Wed, May 4, 2016
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Infovest21's new white paper says some large funds of funds may suffer slow death

Friday, July 27, 2012
Opalesque Industry Update - In its just released white paper, "What's Ahead for Funds of Funds?" Infovest21 examines the current environment for funds of funds; various ways funds of funds have been providing value; as well as opportunities, challenges and outlook for small, medium and large sized funds of funds.

Some of the highlights of the report are:

• Large funds of funds generally agree that funds of funds can survive at the $250-500 million level but become a real business once assets under management hit the $1 billion mark.

• Consolidation over the next 12-18 months will continue at the same pace or even faster than it has so far this year. Many funds of funds have been involved in discussions.

• The conventional thinking is that the largest funds of funds and smaller niche funds of funds will survive but the medium sized funds of funds i.e. those with assets between $1-9 billion will get squeezed. However, some consultants and large funds of funds find potential opportunities with this category. Some large funds of funds are looking for medium-sized funds of funds to add on that are lean and have a stable loyal client base. They are particularly attractive if they specialize in a specific strategy, have a different distribution or a different geographic investor base.

• Funds of funds with $1-2 billion in assets, that were never the recipients of institutional assets, have leaner organizations. With assets mainly from family offices and high net worth investors, they have fatter margins. They haven't been hit with the same magnitude of outflows as the larger funds of funds.

• Valuations are considerably lower than they had been. In 2010, valuations of funds of funds were around seven times EBITDA compared with ten times before the financial crisis.

• Some industry veterans say the old multiple-of-EBITDA model now looks passé. Most of the current transactions are being done on an earn-out basis with very little paid up front. Purchasers are unwilling to pay anything other than a revenue share.

• Some large funds of funds may suffer a slow death. Many businesses will fall apart before the principals do something strategic. Many of the principals pay themselves a big salary and will continue to do so. With institutional investors increasingly allocating directly with hedge funds, a significant part of their asset flow has now been cut off. Their margins are now very thin. It's hard for them to downsize now as it will signal to consultants/institutional investors that they are having problems.

• Many are waiting for the 2007 environment to return. They can't consider a deal today because they received large bids before the financial crisis.

• Faced with this situation, some of the larger funds of funds who have been hit with big outflows are looking at strategic transactions because they can rationalize cost, it pushes assets under management higher and it ameliorates the pain of redemptions.

• Consultants and institutional investors aren't always happy with consolidation and reorganization. They need reassurance that the team, investment process and investment approach will remain intact.Often times, when a consolidation or merger is rumored or announced, consultants and institutions place both parties on a watch list until the situation clarifies which could be 18-24 months.

• Looking out five years, healthy funds of funds will need $5-15 billion to be a real player, have the ability to seed their own products and have true, have interesting diversification, have enough partnerships with managers that they can get interesting things done, and have systems available to do efficient hedging.

• The healthy funds of funds will have a diversified asset stream - an advisory business, a Fund of One business as well as a commingled fund business. They will be able to sit down with the institutional client and determine their tolerance for risk; appetite for returns; need for transparency, liquidity and reporting. They will be able to build a product specifically to meet the clients' needs.

(press release)

For additional information, contact:
Lois Peltz, President, Infovest21
(212) 686 6440
general@infovest21.com

Bg

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Hedge funds see $14.3bn outflows in Q1, CTAs and multi-strategy lead net inflows[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The hedge fund industry saw net outflows of investor capital in the first quarter of the year, totaling $14.3bn, data from Preqin showed. This continues from the $8.9bn overall net outflows that funds recorded in Q4

  2. Third Point calls Q1 "catastrophic" for hedge funds[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The first quarter of this year was rocky for hedge funds based on aggregate performance from the industry, but now we are beginning to hear what the managers thought of it as quarterly letters make their way to investors. Dan Loeb, CEO of New York-based $17 bill

  3. Asia - Stabilization of China's capital outflows may hinge on Janet Yellen, Fink says China to do well this year as bubble threat postponed, Chinese hedge fund to invest in India’s infrastructure[more]

    Stabilization of China's capital outflows may hinge on Janet Yellen From Bloomberg.com: Whether China’s recent stabilization of its currency and capital outflows continues -- or downside pressure reignites -- may hinge in large part on Janet Yellen. If the Federal Reserve chair sticks to

  4. …And Finally - After all, judges are human too[more]

    From Newsoftheweird.com: In March, one District of Columbia government administrative law judge was charged with misdemeanor assault on another. Judge Sharon Goodie said she wanted to give Judge Joan Davenport some files, but Davenport, in her office, would not answer the door. Goodie said once the

  5. Comment - Unmasking the men behind Zero Hedge, Wall Street's renegade blog[more]

    From Bloomberg.com: Colin Lokey, also known as "Tyler Durden," is breaking the first rule of Fight Club: You do not talk about Fight Club. He’s also breaking the second rule of Fight Club. (See the first rule.) After more than a year writing for the financial website Zero Hedge under the n