•  
• Tweet
•  
•  
•        Print
•  
•        Email
•  
•         Track Keywords

From their original position atop the retail and high net worth investor’s “risk pyramid,” the Liquid CTA/Macro industry has broadened out and become a core portfolio component for institutional investors in recent years – from public and corporate pensions to endowments and foundations to family offices.

The research indicates that positive, uncorrelated performance during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis helped accelerate this expansion in the industry’s investor base. Yet, the industry itself also changed to accommodate this new institutional target market. To absorb the extensive asset flows originating from institutions, the industry sought means to extend its capacity and reduce portfolio volatility.

“A significant shift in investment approach has taken place since the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and investors, particularly institutional investors, have been actively looking to diversify their portfolios to better weather periods of unusual market stress,” said Jerome Kemp, Global Head of Futures and OTC Clearing.

As the investor audience base has grown, the distribution model too has evolved. Whereas money was primarily raised for these managers by wire house financial advisors via managed futures product in the early years of the industry, managers now list their funds on institutionally focused capital raising platforms and further develop their own hedge fund-like marketing teams to directly raise assets.

The survey also finds that there has been a decisive shift within the Liquid CTA/Macro manager landscape toward systematic as opposed to discretionary trading. Whereas AUM was fairly evenly split between these two approaches in 2000 (55% systematic and 45% discretionary), according to Barclay Hedge that ratio changed dramatically to 83% systematic and 17% discretionary by the end of 2011.

“These trends are not only driving the industry to be more systematic, but they are also changing the nature of the systems being deployed by participants and allowing for increasingly dynamic and innovative trading models,” continued Sandy Kaul, US Head of Business Advisory for Citi Prime Finance.

According to the research, there has been a significant expansion in the number of models being used to evaluate opportunities, a dramatic shortening of the time frame under consideration, and broad growth in the number of markets being tracked resulting in distinct “generations” of systematic approaches:

• Generation One – primarily a long-term trend-following system focused on the traditional commodity markets
• Generation Two – a set of models with broader measures such as mean reversion, momentum, volatility, and others focused on a more expansive set of financial and currency contracts
• Generation Three – further set of expanded models that layer multiple sets of models on top of the same market and allow prices and positions to be translated across markets and into alternative measures

Press Release

bc