Fri, Aug 26, 2016
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Report: The Magnetar Trade helped keep 2008 bubble going

Monday, April 12, 2010
Opalesque Industry Update: A comprehensive report by ProPublica.org on Friday detailed one of the untold stories that pushed the biggest economic meltdown (of 2008 to early 2009) since the Great Depression and traced it to what is now known as the Magnetar Trade.

In a nutshell, the report said that the Chicago-based market-neutral hedge fund, with the help of nearly every Wall Street banks, helped create $40bn worth of extremely toxic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) after housing prices began to show decline in late 2006.

Magnetar bought the riskiest portion of CDOs and placed bets that its own deals would fail.

Indeed, several people told ProPublica.org that Magnetar pressed to include riskier assets in their CDOs that would make the investments more vulnerable to failure. The hedge fund acknowledges it bet against its own deals but says the majority of its short positions involved similar CDOs that it did not own. Magnetar says it never selected the assets that went into its CDOs.

The report identified nine banks, including Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, UBS and JPMorgan Chase which helped Magnetar to pull off the stunt. It said that most of the bankers who worked with Magnetar personally benefited from the deal and earned millions in annual bonuses. But the banks that assembled and marketed the Magnetar CDOs were the biggest losers when the crash came as they were not able to sell the CDOs.

Nothing illegal
Magnetar did nothing illegal, the report said. And it did not cause the housing bubble or the financial crisis. But the trade illustrates the reckless behavior that typifies the last days of the boom.

If not Magnetar, other Wall Street geniuses would have created mortgage CDOs which would eventually have become worthless, Businessinsider.com said .

Bankers don’t have a clue crisis was forthcoming
At last week’s U.S. Congress hearing by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, mortgage bankers who testified said none of them foresaw the impending sub-prime mortgage failure, nor the financial crisis that followed. While many may find that hard to believe, some experts said the bankers may be speaking the truth.

A separate a report by Businessinder.com said that had Magnetar foreseen the crisis coming, the hedge fund would have shorted Citigroup or other banks which crashed, because that would have required far less work and bigger profit.

It said that Magnetar and the bankers who helped the firm were just looking for a leveraged way to gamble against housing by betting on the riskiest slices of the market. – Precy Dumlao

Bg

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Opalesque Exclusive: Algorithms platform aims to target typical challenges found in quantitative hedge funds[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Last month, Quantopian received investments from Point72 Ventures, the new venture capital arm of Steven Cohen’s Point72 Asset Management.

  2. LatAm hedge funds surge in 1H to +24.4%, emerging markets assets rise[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds investing in Latin America posted strong gains through mid-2016, reversing declines in four of the past five years, including the last three years, to lead all areas of hedge fund performance through the first half of 2016, according to the latest HFR Em

  3. Asia - LGT Capital Partners: Alternatives set for continued rise in Asia[more]

    From Asianinvestor.net: More flows are likely into insurance-linked strategies, private equity and trend-following strategies/CTAs, given the benefits of such investments, argues LGT Capital Partners. Despite the numerous quantitative easing programs and bailouts of recent years, the quest for

  4. Opalesque Roundtable: Low and high fee investments often better than mid fee hedge funds[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds that charge the low and high fees stuff often provide better returns than "those sort of mid-fee investments", said Keith Haydon, chief investment officer of Man FRM. (Alternative) investment managers who charge high fees would often provide the most int

  5. Hedge fund investors pull $5.7 billion in July[more]

    From Bloomberg.com: Hedge funds suffered a third consecutive month of outflows in July as investors withdrew $5.7 billion, according to industry tracker Eurekahedge. Redemptions totaled $20.7 billion in the three months through July, with money managers betting on equities suffering $18.4 bill