Sat, Nov 29, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

GFIA white paper: Investing in hedge funds based on their historic Sharpe ratios is likely to disappoint

Friday, October 23, 2009
Investing in hedge funds based on their historic Sharpe ratios is likely to disappoint GFIA pte ltd, the Singapore based specialist in skill-based managers in Asian and emerging markets, has released a research paper examining the persistence of the Sharpe ratio, a commonly used measure of risk-adjusted return investors, and therefore its effectiveness as an substantive decision making tool.

In this paper, GFIA looks at the persistency of the commonly-used ratio, both at the level of the Asian hedge fund industry overall, and at the strategy level for the five biggest strategy groups.

GFIA also notes that the appropriateness of the Sharpe ratio in the context of hedge funds is questionable, given their typically non-normal return distribution.

- There is no consistency in the strategy mix of the best (worst) performing funds, over different time periods

- Top (worst) performing funds were seldom best (worst) performing in the subsequent period

- No more than 50% of funds in one performance category remained in the same category the subsequent year.

- Macro/ multi-strategy funds showed least persistence in Sharpe ratios over different time periods

Peter Douglas CAIA, FICP, principal of GFIA, commented: “We’ve always been sceptical of Sharpe ratios applied to hedge fund returns, but this research suggest that not only is the ratio academically inappropriate for measuring asymmetric return patterns, but it has almost no predictive power anyway! Allocators clearly should not rely on historic Sharpe ratios as a decision tool in constructing portfolios of Asian hedge funds.”

The white paper is available at www.gfia.com.sg.

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Unlucky Paulson & Co. rebrands $1.6bn Recovery Fund after 13% drop[more]

    From Businessweek.com: A maturing U.S. economic recovery is prompting Paulson & Co. to change course. The $19 billion hedge fund firm, led by billionaire John Paulson, told investors on a conference call this month that the Paulson Recovery Fund will be renamed Paulson Special Situations Fund on Jan

  2. Opalesque Roundtable: Islamic Finance races ahead with Sukuk, the first managed account platform, and foreign demand[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: A number of developments took place within Islamic finance in the past years, including the launch of a Islamic managed account platform and the further growth of the sukuk space that saw this instrument evolve from being a type of an ABS security that was rarely

  3. Fund Profile - A complex hedge fund strategy works for United Technologies[more]

    From Institutionalinvestor.com: Reports that portable alpha is dead have been greatly exaggerated, as Mark Twain might have phrased it. Another Connecticut Yankee, giant United Technologies Corp., is gearing up to grow its successful, nearly decade-long portable-alpha program. The UTC strategy took

  4. Opalesque Exclusive: The unintended consequences of Basel III[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Bijesh Amin, co-founder and managing director of Indus Valley Partners (IVP), a technology solutions and services firm focused on the alternative asset management industry, has recently observed

  5. Legal - Six years after AIG takeover, lawsuit reveals another potential buyer[more]

    From Institutional investor.com: When former Treasury secretary Henry (Hank) Paulson Jr. testified in a suit last month about the U.S. government takeover of American International Group, his words were — mostly — numbingly familiar. Explaining the “punitive” terms set for the September 2008 bailout