Tue, May 5, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

ESMA rules that UCITS may not invest in unregulated hedge funds

Thursday, November 22, 2012
Opalesque Industry Update - In a further indication of policy orientation at European level that is seeking to limit the instruments that UCITS funds may invest in, on 20 November 2012, the European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA") published a formal opinion on its interpretation of Article 50(2)(a) of the UCITS Directive (Directive 2009/65/EC) (the so-called “trash ratio”) which permits UCITS to invest up to 10% of its net assets in transferable securities and money market instruments, other than those eligible assets referred to in Article 50(1).

The Opinion arises from the fact that “questions have emerged about the correct interpretation of this Article and, in particular, whether the derogation…applies to units or shares of collective investment undertakings.”

A number of national regulators, including the Central Bank of Ireland and the CSSF in Luxembourg, have interpreted Article 50(2)(a) as permitting UCITS to invest in unregulated investment funds, including hedge funds, provided the investment complies with the eligibility criteria for UCITS, which is understood as meaning hedge funds that redeem units at the request of unitholders and operate on the principle of risk spreading.

In its Opinion, ESMA states that Article 50(2)(a) refers only to investments in transferable securities and money market instruments and that it does not refer to units or shares of collective investment undertakings.

As a result, ESMA considers that UCITS may only invest in collective investment undertakings that fall within the meaning of Article 50(1)(e), meaning other UCITS, or alternatively, funds that are subject to equivalent supervision as UCITS and which provide an equivalent level of investor protection as UCITS.

In order to comply with the Opinion, UCITS that have investments in hedge funds will be expected to redeem such holdings "taking into account the best interests of investors and at the latest by 31 December 2013". It will be interesting to see whether national regulators look for earlier compliance than the 31 December 2013 deadline.

Following the entering into force of the revised Lamfalussy process, the role of ESMA is to achieve greater consistency in day to day application of EU legislation in the security markets field and it is expected to play an active role in building a common EU supervisory culture and consistent supervisory practice, including by providing opinions to competent authorities and issuing guidelines and recommendations.

Although technically these opinions, guidelines and recommendations are considered to be “soft law” and, therefore, not binding; ESMA’s opinions are a central reference for the work of national regulators. Accordingly, the Opinion should be treated on a comply-or-explain basis by national regulators.

This legal update was published by international law firm Dechert LLP. Corporate website: Source

fg

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges funds of hedge funds Alpha Titans, executives, and auditor for improper expense allocations[more]

    Update: Please note the important updated information at the end of the article.The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against a Santa Barbara, Calif.-based hedge fund advisory firm and two executives involved in improper allocations of fund assets to pay undisclose

  2. Swiss group Pictet releases first public annual and financial reports[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Pictet Group, a Swiss private bank, has just released its first public annual report and financial report since it opened for business in Geneva in 1805. I

  3. Opalesque Exclusive: Carne establishes non-EU ManCo in Jersey[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: For those managers who will not domicile their fund in the European Union (EU) and yet want to distribute it in the EU – especially the UK –, going under the wing of an AIFMD-compliant ManCo on the Channel Islands could be one of the ways to do it. Ch

  4. Opalesque TV: Aequam Capital: Asset management industry will be mainly quantitative going forward[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Before starting his boutique in 2010, Arnaud Chretien, co-founder and CIO of Aequam Capital, worked ten years as a market trader and 18 years as a quantitative and systematic fund manager for Soc

  5. Class-action lawsuit accuse hedge fund Standard General of holding American Apparel hostage[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: A shareholder class-action suit filed on Wednesday accused New York-based hedge fund Standard General of holding American Apparel hostage. It would reportedly reap huge benefits if the clothing company declared bankruptcy. Standard General is the controlling sto

 

banner