Sat, Sep 20, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Cayman defends its reputation as a 'perfectly transparent jurisdiction'

Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Opalesque Industry Update - This week’s article in the left wing UK newspaper, the Independent, headed “There is no moral case for tax havens,” repeats the hoary old clichés and, predictably, mentions the building in the Cayman Islands “that is home to 12,000 corporations.”

Strangely, the writer, Paul Vallely, omits to mention the office at 1209 North Orange Street in Wilmington, Delaware with 217,000 names on the door. If he had, he could have reminded us that this seemingly inconsequential building sits in the home state of Vice President Joe Biden.

Despite the fact The Cayman Islands facilitates the flow of trillions of dollars funded from the international capital markets to the balance sheets of US financial institutions, its demonization continues.

The left wing press, particularly in the UK, seems determined to suspend factual analysis. The effect has been to conflate Cayman, a perfectly transparent jurisdiction focused on beneficially directing international capital flows in a tax efficient manner, with non transparent jurisdictions such as Andorra, Monaco Liechtenstein and Switzerland and others where, as the facts slowly emerge ,we inescapably conclude that tax evasion actually occurs.

No one disagrees that tax evasion is wrong. Certainly not anyone in the Cayman Islands where the transparency debate was concluded over 20 years ago.

Little publicized full transparency tax treaties with the United States and the European Union have been in place with The Cayman Islands for many years.

Only the criminally insane tax evader would attempt to use the Cayman Islands given the sweeping powers of the IRS, DOJ and the European Treasuries to obtain full information on any Cayman account. Yet we find that the expressions ”evasion”, “outrage “,”loopholes “ and ”avoidance”, are now used interchangeably and indiscriminately to describe Cayman financial structuring without reference to legal and accounting precedent, standard or principle or the factual treaty position.

To present a balanced article on offshore tax The Independent should have quoted Daniel J. Mitchell’s work for The Liberal Institute of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation entitled, “The Moral Case for Tax Havens.”

Dr Mitchell concludes that the campaign against low-tax jurisdictions (headed up by organizations such as the EC, United Nations and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) is fundamentally misguided.

He says, “They provide a low-tax platform for economic activity. They facilitate the efficient allocation of capital. And because of tax competition, they encourage better tax law in the rest of the world. “

Echoing a point made earlier in this article he says, “Tax competition affords taxpayers the ability to enjoy more of what they earn. This in turn draws savings, investment and skilled labor into the economy.”

The trouble is that excessively high taxes punish the sub millionaire, middle classes with two cars in the garage and three children heading for college. Stifle this section of the community and you’ll soon have no community.

(press release)


This was authored by Richard Coles, the Chairman of Cayman Finance, the body which represents the financial services industry on the islands. www.caymanfinances.com

The Independent’s article can be found here: Source


Bg

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges 19 investment firms and one trader for breach of Rule 105[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started a push to enhance the enforcement of Rule 105 of Regulation M last year to uncover hedge funds and private equity firms that have illegally participated in an offering of a stock after short selling it duri

  2. Fund managers, bullish on Europe, anticipate monetary policy separation of Fed and ECB[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: At least 202 fund managers with $556bn of assets under management said that while the European Central Bank (ECB) has eased its monetary policy that sent sentiments towards Europe to pick up, the Fed is expected to hike its rate in the spring of 2015. Investor

  3. Institutions - North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds, UK pension fund criticizes hedge fund fees[more]

    North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds From Forbes.com: The State Employees Association of North Carolina this afternoon called on state Treasurer Janet Cowell to withdraw all investments in hedge funds, which appear to amount to approximately $6 b

  4. News Briefs - Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes, Just one week left until NYC's Rocktoberfest[more]

    Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes On September 5, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Chief Counsel Advice 201436049, concluding that members of an investment manager were subject to self-employment taxes with respect to their e

  5. Institutions - Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move Advisers weigh in on CalPERS’ decision, Gina Raimondo sees no reason to follow California’s lead, exit hedge funds, Danish pension funds step up 'alternative investments'[more]

    Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move From WSJ.com: Financial advisers who use hedge funds in their clients' portfolios say they aren't rethinking that approach after a huge California pension fund announced plans to exit the hedge-fund market. The decision by the Cali