Tue, Sep 23, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Charter Hall vows to fight hedge funds threat, but analysts said the firm would fold up

Monday, June 20, 2011

David Harrison
Opalesque Industry Update – Charter Hall fund, which is at loggerhead with at least three hedge funds (that together own 18.2% of Charter Hall Office REIT), has vowed over the weekend to defend its management after the hedge funds scheduled a meeting for shareholders in July to vote on appointing Bill Moss to take control of the fund. Moss built the Macquarie Group into a $23bn platform before leaving the firm in 2007. The Charter Hall Office REIT was previously known as the Macquarie Office Trust before Moss sold it to Charter Hall in March 2011 as part of a larger $300m deal.

"There is no way Charter Hall is going to sit back and allow these guys to interfere in the market," Charter Hall joint managing director David Harrison told The Australian.

The infighting between the management of Charter Hall and hedge funds, Capital, Luxor Capital and Point Lobos Capital, was apparently sparked by the decision made by Charter Hall in late May 2011 to sell 100% of its $1.6bn US component of the business, with a shortlist of 28 buyers for specific assets or the entire portfolio.

Amongst the names which emerged as the likely buyer of Charter Hall’s U.S. properties, is a Charter Hall-managed trust comprising Charter Hall Office REIT and Australian superannuation funds.

The Australian reported that the New York-based Orange Capita has accused Charter Hall of undervaluing the assets by at least $108m.

Last week, the three hedge funds met and scheduled a meeting for all shareholders on July 27, to vote on removing Charter Hall as the responsible manager of the trust and to instead appoint Moss Capital Funds Management, led by Bill Moss and Glenn Wills, and backed up by asset manager Fortius Funds Management.

In an emailed statement, Orange said that Fortius Funds and Moss Capital have already signified their intentions to manage the trust, proceed with the sale of the U.S. assets, hunt for bidders for its Australian assets and review whether any of its approximately $200m should be returned to unitholders.

“Moss Capital and Fortius are well positioned to manage Charter Hall’s assets,” said the statement.

Charter Hall fund to wind-up
Amidst the struggle for control over the Charter Hall fund, broking analysts are predicting that Charter Hall is set for a wind-up by Moss Capital and Fortius Funds instead of the firms becoming perceived long-term caretakers of the fund.

UBS’s Tom Bodor and John Freedman issued a note to clients over the weekend which said that the proposed appointment of Moss Capital and Fortius Funds as responsible entity or manager for Charter hall “seems satisfactory for a wind-up/sale role but might be less so as an ongoing operator.”

''A change in RE will likely see Charter Hall Office Fund disappear (though perhaps slowly) given the activists are likely to propose revising the RE fees to incentivize this. Tax consequences will vary for different holders and scenarios but, according to the activists, this might be avoided with a 100 per cent equity takeout,” the note added.

For his part, Peter Zuk, of Goldman Sachs, has acknowledged that the proposed appointment of new managers raises more questions.

Zuk added, ''If/when the US asset sales are executed, will proceeds be required to firstly repay Australian debt, or will a potential return of capital to investors still be possible?. What does this mean for Australian assets that are co-owned by the office fund and whether the joint-venture partners look to acquire the balance of ownership?''
Precy Dumlao

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges 19 investment firms and one trader for breach of Rule 105[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started a push to enhance the enforcement of Rule 105 of Regulation M last year to uncover hedge funds and private equity firms that have illegally participated in an offering of a stock after short selling it duri

  2. Outlook - Julian Robertson: There are two bubbles that can bite us[more]

    From Businessinsider.com: Legendary hedge fund manager Julian Robertson gave a warning about two bubbles that could "bite us" at Bloomberg Market's Most Influential Summit. "I agree with the fact that the economy is definitely getting better. I think the cause of that is two bubbles that will

  3. Fund managers, bullish on Europe, anticipate monetary policy separation of Fed and ECB[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: At least 202 fund managers with $556bn of assets under management said that while the European Central Bank (ECB) has eased its monetary policy that sent sentiments towards Europe to pick up, the Fed is expected to hike its rate in the spring of 2015. Investor

  4. Institutions - North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds, UK pension fund criticizes hedge fund fees[more]

    North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds From Forbes.com: The State Employees Association of North Carolina this afternoon called on state Treasurer Janet Cowell to withdraw all investments in hedge funds, which appear to amount to approximately $6 b

  5. News Briefs - Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes, Just one week left until NYC's Rocktoberfest[more]

    Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes On September 5, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Chief Counsel Advice 201436049, concluding that members of an investment manager were subject to self-employment taxes with respect to their e