Thu, Aug 25, 2016
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Largest hedge funds buy more, pay less for protection against SEC and investor lawsuit costs

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Wayne Siebner
Large hedge funds with over $10 billion in assets under management (AUM) typically purchase $40 million or more in professional liability insurance coverage, nearly 200% more than medium funds between $1 billion and $3 billion in AUM according to a benchmark study by SKCG Group, the risk management and insurance advisor to some of the world’s largest hedge funds. The study of 250 hedge fund liability insurance purchases also revealed that, dollar for dollar, the bigger funds pay less for their coverage. This, coupled with a more strenuous regulatory environment and heightened investor expectations, is making it impractical for these larger funds to self insure – that is, pay out of pocket – for the costs of trading errors, investor and SEC lawsuits and investigations.

“Before the financial crisis, it wasn’t uncommon for large hedge funds to just eat the costs of investigations and lawsuits resulting from trading errors and other mistakes. This simply doesn’t make sense anymore when the price of insurance against these costs has declined by as much as 20% in the last 2 years and is even more inexpensive to the largest funds who buy higher limits,” said Wayne Siebner, Senior Vice President and Manager of Executive and Professional Liability for SKCG Group.

The secret behind the favorable pricing for big hedge funds lies in the special way that policies over the typical $5 to $10 million in face value are underwritten. When a fund needs a larger amount of protection, special programs are created which layer coverage from multiple carriers. One carrier will assume the risk for the first $5 to $10 million while another will assume the risk for the next $5 to $10 million, and so on. Naturally, the premiums paid to the insurer of secondary and tertiary layers are less than that of the primary layer because that coverage is less likely to be drawn upon. This means that a large fund which purchases $40 million in protection may have as many as 7 carriers underwriting those limits with each carrier getting paid less than the one before it based upon the order in which they assume risk.

“Other than favorable pricing, the second factor driving large funds to purchase E&O/D&O coverage is investor demand. Years ago, if a trader made an error the fund would simply incur the loss and try to make it up somewhere else. Investors aren’t having that anymore, nor are they keen to have defense costs for lawsuits and investigations come out of their potential returns,” added Thomas R. Kozera, CEO of SKCG Group. “This means that today, seeing that a fund is properly insured is gaining rapidly in priority on investors’ due diligence check lists.”

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. LatAm hedge funds surge in 1H to +24.4%, emerging markets assets rise[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds investing in Latin America posted strong gains through mid-2016, reversing declines in four of the past five years, including the last three years, to lead all areas of hedge fund performance through the first half of 2016, according to the latest HFR Em

  2. Asia - LGT Capital Partners: Alternatives set for continued rise in Asia[more]

    From Asianinvestor.net: More flows are likely into insurance-linked strategies, private equity and trend-following strategies/CTAs, given the benefits of such investments, argues LGT Capital Partners. Despite the numerous quantitative easing programs and bailouts of recent years, the quest for

  3. Investors yank money from hedge funds after poor performance[more]

    From Marketwatch.com: A growing exodus from hedge funds extended to two of the biggest names in the industry Tuesday, Tudor Investment Corp. and Brevan Howard, as disenchanted investors increasingly shun what was once the hottest place to put money. The funds’ problem is clear: They just aren’t perf

  4. Banks look at hedge funds differently - and it should matter to allocators[more]

    From Valuewalk.com: Looking at two bank reports on the same topic can often yield interesting results. There are times when bank research is best viewed from the standpoint of how their analysis does or does not correlate with one another. Regarding hedge fund allocation decisions, one bank appears

  5. Legal - Hedge fund’s fixer kept deals flowing with bribes, U.S. says, Big four banks sued by U.S. hedge funds over BBSW, Lessons for hedge fund managers from the government's failed prosecution of alleged insider trading[more]

    Hedge fund’s fixer kept deals flowing with bribes, U.S. says From Bloomberg.com: With the Miami villa, stopovers at New York’s Plaza Hotel and millions channeled in bribes to win mining deals, Samuel Mebiame was the relationships guy in a corruption scheme that spanned continents, accord