Wed, Oct 1, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Significant minority of hedge fund managers support final AIFM Directive, 32% believe regulation is necessary

Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Opalesque Industry Update - A Preqin survey of over 100 alternative assets fund managers and investors found that just under a third support the AIFM Directive to some extent, with firms in certain countries where the new legislation will replace more restrictive existing rules believing that it will serve to improve conditions. However, for the majority there exists significant resentment towards the Directive.

Key Findings of the Survey Include:

• 89% believe the Directive should be amended to further take into account the differences between the various asset classes.

• 59% foresee the AIFM Directive creating a European lock-in/lock-out.

• 45% think that it is likely or very likely that fund managers will relocate to outside of Europe as a result of the AIFM Directive; 26% felt that it was likely their firm specifically would relocate.

• 28% believe that the introduction of the EU Passport will have the biggest impact on the industry, while 22% feel the requirement that non-EU fund managers comply with the Directive will be the most significant measure.

• Just 3% believe that increased regulations relating to retail investors will have the greatest impact.

• The impact of the Directive on innovation, the additional costs firms will incur, and the effect of these costs on profitability are all major causes for concern.

• A significant number feel that venture capital firms should be excluded from the jurisdiction.

Tim Friedman, Head of Communications commented:

“Preqin’s survey suggests that there is a certain level of support for the AIFM Directive, with just under a third of respondents stating that they back it. There is a feeling among practitioners in countries such as Italy and Croatia that conditions will actually be less restrictive as a result of the Directive’s introduction. However, the overriding response was negative, and a number of the issues that were raised voluntarily by respondents were recurring: lack of differentiation between the asset classes, the negative impact liquidity requirements will have on innovation, and the fact that the legislation has been constructed by politicians with little or no understanding of the alternative assets industry. Perhaps most of all, there is a feeling that alternative assets firms were not responsible for the financial crisis, and that the new legislation will create significant extra burden while not serving to enhance the stability of financial markets.”

Full analysis of the survey results, including an overview of the AIFM Directive and comments from the Secretary-General of the EVCA and CEO of the BVCA available: Source

(press release)

kb http://www.preqin.com/docs/reports/AIFM_Directive.pdf

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Socially responsible investments grow in demand, but performance questions persist[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: A study by financial services firm TIAA-CREF showed that interest in socially responsible investing (SRI) is increasing rapidly, but investors are still asking if investing in an SRI strategy

  2. Regulatory - Ireland launches structure for passporting loan origination funds within EU[more]

    From Asiaasset.com: The Irish Funds Industry Association (IFIA) has introduced new loan origination capabilities that will offer Asian managers and investors a new structure under the European Union’s (EU’s) Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). The new structure will allow the mar

  3. Europe - Ed Miliband's war on hedge funds could damage City of London[more]

    From Telegraph.co.uk: Ed Miliband’s plans to wage war on hedge funds could be potentially more damaging to the City of London than even the financial transaction tax (FTT), senior banking sources warned on Tuesday night. The Leader of the Opposition took aim at a number of industries as part of his

  4. News Briefs - SEC probes Pimco ETF over pricing irregularities, BEPs: Action plan released and UK first to adopt country-by-country reporting[more]

    SEC probes Pimco ETF over pricing irregularities The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating Pimco’s pricing of exchange traded funds, the latest cloud to hang over the world’s largest bond manager, which has been dogged by poor performance and management infighting. Pimco on

  5. CalPERS’ move might alter hedge fund fees for good[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: When CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, announced on September 15th that it was unwinding its hedge-fund portfolio, it was seen by many as is a significant blow to the sector’s appeal. The Fund is