Sun, Sep 21, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Ogier: Impact analysis for Jersey and Guernsey Investment Funds

Friday, November 12, 2010
Opalesque Industry Update - After a protracted period of negotiation the AIFM Directive was finally approved by the European Parliament on 11 November 2010.

The Directive is expected to be brought into force shortly and will regulate the activities of managers of alternative investment funds (“AIF Managers”) as follows:

(a) if the AIF Manager is based in the EU, on its worldwide activities; and
(b) if the AIF Manager is based in a third country outside the EU (a “Third Country”), only to the extent that it has activities within the EU.

The position of Third Country AIF Managers was initially contentious but has now been resolved by creating a dual system of allowing the existing private placement rules to continue until at least 2018, while also phasing in an option for Third Country AIF Managers to qualify under an EU passporting regime.

Private Placement Rules
Third Country AIF Managers will be able to continue to market Third Country funds to professional investors in EU Member States by using the existing private placement rules until at least 2018, subject to the following conditions:

1) Regulatory Co-operation
A supervisory co-operation agreement must be in place between the regulator of the EU Member State in which the fund is to be marketed and the Third Country regulator of the AIF Manager. Jersey is a founding signatory to the IOSCO multilateral memorandum of understanding and already has bilateral regulatory agreements with the UK and with ten other EU Member States. Guernsey is also an IOSCO signatory and has bilateral regulatory agreements with the UK and seven other EU Member States.

2) Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”)
The Third Country where the AIF Manager and the fund is established must not be on the FATF blacklist. The Channel Islands have extremely high anti-money laundering standards and Jersey is rated by the IMF as being at the top of global standards and significantly ahead of a number of EU Member States. The IMF is expected to release its report on Guernsey shortly. Neither Jersey nor Guernsey is on the FATF blacklist.

3) Transparency and Reporting
The Third Country fund must comply with certain transparency and reporting requirements set out in the Directive. In summary, the fund’s annual report must disclose, as relevant, its principal counterparty exposures, liquidity arrangements, risk management arrangements, any controlling interests and certain other matters prescribed under the Directive.

Private placement has been the standard distribution model for the marketing of alternative investment funds both within and outside the EU for a number of years. Jersey or Guernsey general partners of limited partnerships established in the Channel Islands and Jersey and Guernsey incorporated managers of corporate funds set up in the Channel Islands will continue to be able to rely on private placements for marketing of alternative investment funds in the EU, until at least 2018 when the Directive will be subject to review. However, once the Directive comes into effect, EU AIF Managers will no longer be permitted to use the private placement rules for marketing alternative investment funds, even on a domestic distribution basis. Instead, EU AIF Managers will be required to comply with the more onerous requirements of the proposed passporting regime. This may lead arrangers to prefer to use a Third Country AIF Manager formed in the Channel Islands.

Passporting
Third Country funds which are based in jurisdictions whose regulatory regimes qualify as equivalent in effect to EU standards will be able to apply for a passport for the fund to be marketed throughout the EU. Passporting for Third Country funds is expected to become available within two years of the Directive being implemented and will be subject to compliance with the Directive and to the following conditions: In addition to the requirement for supervisory co-operation agreements to be in place (similar to those provided above in relation to the private placement rules), the Third Country AIF Manager must also appoint a representative in the EU Member State with which it has the most substantive connection.

2) FATF
The Third Country must not be on the FATF blacklist (as provided above in relation to the private placement rules).

3) Tax Information
A tax information exchange agreement (“TIEA”) must be in place between the Third Country where the fund is based and each EU Member State where the fund is to be marketed. Jersey currently has TIEAs with the UK and with ten other EU Member States. Guernsey has TIEAs with the UK and twelve other EU Member States.

On the basis of current regulatory policy in the Channel Islands, Jersey and Guernsey should comfortably satisfy the equivalence requirements as their regulatory standards conform to international best practice and in many respects are more developed than those of a number of EU Member States.

However, the costs of complying with the full requirements of the Directive, in terms of capital adequacy, leverage restrictions, appointment of external valuation agents, depository and other requirements may impact adversely on a fund’s total expense ratio. The benefits of passporting are likely to accrue principally to retail funds which are marketed on a pan-European basis. However, alternative investment funds have traditionally been marketed on a selective distribution basis to professional and institutional investors and for such funds the benefits of passporting may prove to be illusory.

Passive Marketing
The Directive does not apply to passive marketing or to reverse solicitation. This means, in effect, that EU investors may contact Third Country AIF Managers and invest in Third Country funds even if the AIF Manager does not satisfy any of the provisions of the Directive.

Marketing outside the European Union
EU AIF Managers and EU alternative investment funds will become subject to significant additional requirements under the Directive, including disclosure requirements, leverage limitations, concentration restrictions, reporting requirements and caps on remuneration for managers. As a result, it is expected that a number of arrangers will wish to establish Third Country funds and/or feeder funds and associated Third Country AIF managers for the purposes of marketing alternative investment funds to investors based in the United States or Asia.

(press release)

Corporate website:Source
KM

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges 19 investment firms and one trader for breach of Rule 105[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started a push to enhance the enforcement of Rule 105 of Regulation M last year to uncover hedge funds and private equity firms that have illegally participated in an offering of a stock after short selling it duri

  2. Fund managers, bullish on Europe, anticipate monetary policy separation of Fed and ECB[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: At least 202 fund managers with $556bn of assets under management said that while the European Central Bank (ECB) has eased its monetary policy that sent sentiments towards Europe to pick up, the Fed is expected to hike its rate in the spring of 2015. Investor

  3. Institutions - North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds, UK pension fund criticizes hedge fund fees[more]

    North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds From Forbes.com: The State Employees Association of North Carolina this afternoon called on state Treasurer Janet Cowell to withdraw all investments in hedge funds, which appear to amount to approximately $6 b

  4. News Briefs - Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes, Just one week left until NYC's Rocktoberfest[more]

    Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes On September 5, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Chief Counsel Advice 201436049, concluding that members of an investment manager were subject to self-employment taxes with respect to their e

  5. Institutions - Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move Advisers weigh in on CalPERS’ decision, Gina Raimondo sees no reason to follow California’s lead, exit hedge funds, Danish pension funds step up 'alternative investments'[more]

    Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move From WSJ.com: Financial advisers who use hedge funds in their clients' portfolios say they aren't rethinking that approach after a huge California pension fund announced plans to exit the hedge-fund market. The decision by the Cali