Sun, Apr 19, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

Lipper research highlights difficulties in picking outperforming actively managed funds

Tuesday, May 08, 2012

Beverly Chandler, Opalesque London: A report from Lipper by Ed Moisson, head of UK and Cross-Border Research, examining how successful actively managed mutual funds in Europe have been in out-performing indices over the past twenty years, finds that typically 40% of equity funds out-perform their benchmarks, although this figure varies widely over time and for funds investing in different regions.

In Beating the Benchmark Moisson writes: "Active fund managers’ ability to out-perform their benchmarks sits near the heart of any discussion on the relative merits of active versus passive investing". It is the different level of risk in actively managed funds and the associated additional cost of actively managing investments that weighs against their popularity. Investors are concerned that actively managed funds will, against all that, significantly under-perform the index, Moisson says. "The argument against investing in a passively managed fund is that one not only misses out on the possibility of superior returns that an active manager can offer, but also that, in principle, one is guaranteed to under-perform the index".

However, going by statistics alone, the active fund management industry is clearly more popular with actively managed equity funds in Europe standing at just under €1.5trn, ($1.31trn) while index trackers have €160bn ($209bn) and ETFs €139bn ($181bn). "In other ......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Tiger Global falls 2.9% in March, down 5.3% in Q1[more]

    From Reuters.com: Investment firm Tiger Global Management, one of the hedge fund industry's most closely watched players, told clients that its hedge fund lost 5.3 percent during the first quarter, an investor said on Wednesday. Much of the decline came in March when the fund lost 2.9 percent,

  2. It’s not just hedge funds—IMF study finds stability risks from ‘vanilla’ funds[more]

    From MarketWatch.com: Leveraged hedge funds and banklike money-market funds are the parts of the asset-management industry most associated with risks to financial stability. But a report from the International Monetary Fund suggests that “plain-vanilla” mutual funds and exchange-traded funds also ca

  3. Hedge funds gain 2.4% in Q1 driven by currency and commodity markets[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds posted positive results last March to conclude a strong first quarter, with performance driven by strong macro trends in currency and commodity markets, complemented by broad-based gains and positioning in event driven, equity hedge and fixed income-b

  4. Hedge funds looking to continue their rally in Q2[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds finished the first quarter on a strong note and are looking to continue the rally in the second quarter, said Lyxor Asset Management in its Weekly Brief. The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index is up 0.4% over the week

  5. Hedge funds down -0.17% in March (+1.23%YTD)[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The hedge fund industry produced an aggregate return of –0.17% in March to end Q1 2015 up 1.23%, compared to the S&P 500 which increased 0.96%, according to the latest data from eVestment. Hedge fund performance returns were mixed in March amid increased equity

 

banner