Mon, Oct 5, 2015
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
New Managers May 2013

Peter Urbani' Statistics - Ignoring serial auto-correlation may understate hedge fund volatility by more than 30%

In a recent paper, Marcos Lopez de Prado of Hess Energy Trading Company and David H. Bailey of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, derive closed form approximations for Expected Maximum Drawdown (MaxDD). They also derive formulae for the expected time to reach the Maximum Drawdown (t*) and the expected Maximum Time Under Water (MaxTuW), which under the assumption of IID Normality turns out to be three times the time taken to reach the maximum drawdown. Bailey and de Prado show that this ‘Triple Penance Rule' holds independently of the Sharpe Ratio.

This has important consequences for people who may be using some combination of drawdown and Sharpe Ratio to stop out loss-making funds.

Moreover, Bailey and de Prado show that under the more general case, when first-order serial-auto-correlation is accounted for, the Triple Penance rule may no longer apply as the higher volatility of positively serial auto correlated funds may enable them to recover faster than 3 x the length of time it took the drawdown to occur.

They state,” We provide a theoretical justification to why investment firms typically set less strict stop-out rules to portfolio managers with higher Sharpe ratios, despite the fact that they should be expected to deliver superior performance. We generalize this framework to the case

of first-order auto-correlated investment outcomes, and conclude that ignoring the effect of serial correlation leads to a gross underestimation of the downside potential of hedge fund strategies, by as much as 70%. We also estimate that some hedge funds may be firing more than three times the number of skilful portfolio mana......................

To view our full article please login

This article was published in Opalesque's New Managers a top-down monthly analysis, news and research publication on the global emerging manager space.
New Managers
New Managers
New Managers

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Performance - Hedge fund moguls Einhorn, Loeb, Rosenstein lose money in September, Risky strategy sinks small hedge fund[more]

    Hedge fund moguls Einhorn, Loeb, Rosenstein lose money in September From Billionaire stock pickers David Einhorn, Daniel Loeb and Barry Rosenstein on Wednesday told their wealthy investors they lost money in September as market turmoil inflicted more pain on some of America'

  2. Opalesque Exclusive: IRAs represent billions of untapped capital for hedge funds[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Retirement accounts might not be the first source that comes to mind for those looking to raise funds, but they may represent billions of untapped capital. Unlike traditional retirement accounts,

  3. Opalesque TV: One way to access market hedge funds in the EU under the AIFMD radar[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: While the Cayman Islands, the US and Hong Kong await the pan-European marketing passport to be extended to alternative investment fund

  4. Investing - U.S. biotech bloodbath hits hedge funds but some bargains emerge, Computer-driven hedge funds betting on further stock selloff[more]

    U.S. biotech bloodbath hits hedge funds but some bargains emerge From A seven-day selloff of U.S. biotechnology stocks has hit sector investors - especially hedge funds - hard. But some managers say it was overdone and are already eyeing bargains such as Gilead Sciences Inc

  5. Vilas’ equity long bias hedge fund generates market-beating results[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The Vilas Fund, an equity long bias fund managed by Chicago, Illinois-based Vilas Capital Management, posted five-year annualized returns, net of fees, of 23.47% vs. 15.87% for the S&P 500 Index, including divid