Mon, Sep 22, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

FIA statement on CFTC customer protection rule

Thursday, October 31, 2013
Opalesque Industry Update - The Futures Industry Association today issued the following statement regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s final rule on customer protections:

FIA strongly supports the vast majority of the customer protections contained in the rule, many of which grew out of recommendations made by an FIA task force in the wake of the MF Global collapse. The codification of these requirements strengthens the protections and safeguards for customers, and we commend the Commission for finalizing these important changes.

However, we oppose the CFTC’s final language on residual interest for all the reasons that FIA, agricultural customers and Members of Congress have articulated to the Commission over the last several months of its consideration. Once it takes effect, this rule will require far-reaching changes to industry practices, and as has been recognized, this will most disadvantage agricultural customers and small futures commission merchants. Importantly this residual interest provision would not protect customers in an MF Global situation.

We appreciate that in the final rule the Commission modified the residual interest requirement by phasing in the required changes over five years and by requiring a study and a roundtable to assess the impact of such changes. We are concerned, however, that it may prove difficult for any future Commission to adjust or revise this policy. The Commission’s residual interest requirements are based on an interpretation of FCM obligations that goes against decades of CFTC and industry practice. We disagree with this interpretation, and while we support studying the impact of the changes required by the new requirements, we want the study to be meaningful.

For that reason, we welcome the comments made by several Commissioners at yesterday’s meeting that recognize the agency’s discretion and willingness to modify its policy on residual interest in response to the information it receives about the impact of these changes. Nonetheless, we think the better course would have been to adopt Commissioner O’Malia’s amendment, which would have achieved the Commission’s purpose without seeming to pre-determine the outcome.

FIA looks forward to working with the Commission over the coming months to provide additional data and facts on the implications of today’s decision.

Futures Industry Association

Press Release

BM

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SEC charges 19 investment firms and one trader for breach of Rule 105[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) started a push to enhance the enforcement of Rule 105 of Regulation M last year to uncover hedge funds and private equity firms that have illegally participated in an offering of a stock after short selling it duri

  2. Fund managers, bullish on Europe, anticipate monetary policy separation of Fed and ECB[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: At least 202 fund managers with $556bn of assets under management said that while the European Central Bank (ECB) has eased its monetary policy that sent sentiments towards Europe to pick up, the Fed is expected to hike its rate in the spring of 2015. Investor

  3. Institutions - North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds, UK pension fund criticizes hedge fund fees[more]

    North Carolina workers call on state pension to dump up to $6bn in hedge funds From Forbes.com: The State Employees Association of North Carolina this afternoon called on state Treasurer Janet Cowell to withdraw all investments in hedge funds, which appear to amount to approximately $6 b

  4. News Briefs - Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes, Just one week left until NYC's Rocktoberfest[more]

    Limited partners of investment managers may be subject to self-employment taxes On September 5, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Chief Counsel Advice 201436049, concluding that members of an investment manager were subject to self-employment taxes with respect to their e

  5. Institutions - Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move Advisers weigh in on CalPERS’ decision, Gina Raimondo sees no reason to follow California’s lead, exit hedge funds, Danish pension funds step up 'alternative investments'[more]

    Adviser's faith in hedge funds unshaken by CalPERS' move From WSJ.com: Financial advisers who use hedge funds in their clients' portfolios say they aren't rethinking that approach after a huge California pension fund announced plans to exit the hedge-fund market. The decision by the Cali