Sun, Aug 2, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Islamic Finance Intelligence

Industry Snapshot: Islamic Fund of Funds, a Rare Breed Bernardo Vizcaino, CAIA

Friday, July 03, 2009

Industry Tables

Islamic fund of funds, A Rare Breed
By Bernardo Vizcaino, CAIA

Within the wide range of Shariah compliant products, the multi-manager or fund of funds concept has taken some time to establish itself. Diversification and access to quality mandates are often-quoted advantages of multi-manager providers (although it is increasingly clear that providing due diligence scrutiny is at the top of client’s requirements as well). This aspect is exacerbated due to the limited availability of track records, which makes manager scrutiny even more vital. Nonetheless, both of the core Islamic finance markets (GCC and Southeast Asia) provide evidence that the classic fund of funds programme has yet to arrive in full swing.

Take for instance Saudi Arabia, where multi-managers have been a hallmark of product offerings, yet it is quite telling that they are predominantly referred to as portfolios rather than anything else. The use of this term (as opposed to a straight fund of funds) reflects product shortage and/or lack of product awareness. The head of mutual funds for one of the largest Islamic banks in the Kingdom once referred to this challenge as the “constrained universe.” Indeed, fund sponsors have seen their multi-manager platforms migrate towards the realm of single-managers (i.e. incorporating direct/active allocation of a portion of their assets). As a direct consequence of this flexibility, investments often include illiquid allocations (i.e. real estate) or direct trading in specific instruments (i.e. sukuk). Thus to successfully manage these portfolios a rather wide skill set is required – something that is very rare to find and difficult to harmonize.

The wholesale market in Malaysia proves to hold idiosyncrasies of its own. While wholesale products (across the various providers) avoid pockets of direct allocation, they more often than not package their in-house single-managers into their multi-manager offerings. This “bad habit” is borne out of a marketing-oriented rationale, yet it can introduce a moral hazard which ultimately fails to deliver value to the end consumer. It would be difficult to substantiate how the entire range of single manager products from a specific institution can all be considered as the best choices for inclusion into a multi-manager fund. The need for independent and un-biased asset allocation decisions is evident, yet elusive. A natural counterargument would be that these single-manager products are being bundled together for easy digestion by investors, although the secondary layer of fees being introduced is hardly justifiable (as opposed to well-documented benefits that arrive from a pure third-party fund of fund manager).

The fund of fund as a pure-play is thus rare but not impossible to find. A sample of these is included in the adjacent table, and while these are few and far in between they prove the concept is taking root across the marketplace. It seems the constrained universe is being finally tamed.

Sample Fund of Islamic Funds

Fund Manager Domicile Launch Date Mgmt Fee Perf Fee
Al Dar Asset Management Kuwait June 2005 1% NA
Global Investment House Bahrain July 2007 1% 20%
Rasmala Investments Cayman Islands January 2007 1% - 1.5% NA%



Article Link

<< Go Back to Archive

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Opalesque Exclusive: Despite bumpy June/July, CTAs hold on[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: To say that things have been rocky in managed futures recently is putting it mildly. In June, the industry saw its worst month on a performance basis in the past four years. Then yesterday,

  2. Investing - Hedge fund billionaires bet on London as revival gathers pace[more]

    From Bloomberg.com: London’s fund industry is bouncing back, and U.S. billionaires Steven A. Cohen and Ken Griffin are grabbing a piece of the action. Griffin’s Citadel and Millennium Management, a hedge fund run by Israel Englander, have bulked up in London, where asset growth is outpacing the U.S.

  3. Other Voices: Same day reporting and the evolving role of fund administrators[more]

    By: Scott Price, Head of Business Development and Client Management for North America, Maitland Ernst & Young’s latest glob

  4. Cowen Group, Inc. to acquire Conifer Securities[more]

    Cowen Group, Inc. and Conifer Securities, LLC had announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which Cowen will acquire Conifer Securities, the prime services division of Conifer Financial Services LLC. The transaction, the terms of which have not yet been disclosed, was approved by the boa

  5. Cargill’s Black River Asset to shut down four hedge funds[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Cargill Inc.’s $7.4 billion Black River Asset Management said it was closing four hedge funds with a combined $ 1 billion in assets and start returning investors money over the next several months, various media said. The hedge funds represent 15% of Black River’

 

banner