Wed, Aug 23, 2017
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Islamic Finance Intelligence

Industry Snapshot: Islamic Fund of Funds, a Rare Breed Bernardo Vizcaino, CAIA

Friday, July 03, 2009

Industry Tables

Islamic fund of funds, A Rare Breed
By Bernardo Vizcaino, CAIA

Within the wide range of Shariah compliant products, the multi-manager or fund of funds concept has taken some time to establish itself. Diversification and access to quality mandates are often-quoted advantages of multi-manager providers (although it is increasingly clear that providing due diligence scrutiny is at the top of client’s requirements as well). This aspect is exacerbated due to the limited availability of track records, which makes manager scrutiny even more vital. Nonetheless, both of the core Islamic finance markets (GCC and Southeast Asia) provide evidence that the classic fund of funds programme has yet to arrive in full swing.

Take for instance Saudi Arabia, where multi-managers have been a hallmark of product offerings, yet it is quite telling that they are predominantly referred to as portfolios rather than anything else. The use of this term (as opposed to a straight fund of funds) reflects product shortage and/or lack of product awareness. The head of mutual funds for one of the largest Islamic banks in the Kingdom once referred to this challenge as the “constrained universe.” Indeed, fund sponsors have seen their multi-manager platforms migrate towards the realm of single-managers (i.e. incorporating direct/active allocation of a portion of their assets). As a direct consequence of this flexibility, investments often include illiquid allocations (i.e. real estate) or direct trading in specific instruments (i.e. sukuk). Thus to successfully manage these portfolios a rather wide skill set is required – something that is very rare to find and difficult to harmonize.

The wholesale market in Malaysia proves to hold idiosyncrasies of its own. While wholesale products (across the various providers) avoid pockets of direct allocation, they more often than not package their in-house single-managers into their multi-manager offerings. This “bad habit” is borne out of a marketing-oriented rationale, yet it can introduce a moral hazard which ultimately fails to deliver value to the end consumer. It would be difficult to substantiate how the entire range of single manager products from a specific institution can all be considered as the best choices for inclusion into a multi-manager fund. The need for independent and un-biased asset allocation decisions is evident, yet elusive. A natural counterargument would be that these single-manager products are being bundled together for easy digestion by investors, although the secondary layer of fees being introduced is hardly justifiable (as opposed to well-documented benefits that arrive from a pure third-party fund of fund manager).

The fund of fund as a pure-play is thus rare but not impossible to find. A sample of these is included in the adjacent table, and while these are few and far in between they prove the concept is taking root across the marketplace. It seems the constrained universe is being finally tamed.

Sample Fund of Islamic Funds

Fund Manager Domicile Launch Date Mgmt Fee Perf Fee
Al Dar Asset Management Kuwait June 2005 1% NA
Global Investment House Bahrain July 2007 1% 20%
Rasmala Investments Cayman Islands January 2007 1% - 1.5% NA%



Article Link

<< Go Back to Archive

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Opalesque Exclusive: Albright Capital puts a value lens on emerging markets[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: Over the past decade, investors have steadily increased investments in emerging markets private funds. Allocations to the cohort have increased from $93 billion in December 2006 to $564 billion in September 2016, according to data from research firm Preqin. Howe

  2. FinTech - Danger: Crowdfunding on the wrong platform could force you to go public[more]

    From LinkedIn.com: Some equity crowdfunding platforms are putting startups at serious risk. Working with a platform that doesn't structure your deal appropriately could jeopardize your ability to raise future capital or worse, force you to become a public reporting company. The emergence of eq

  3. David Tepper says we're 'nowhere near an overheated' stock market[more]

    From Marketwatch.com: Billionaire David Tepper thinks comparing this current stock-market environment with the overheated markets of 1999 is "ridiculous." The hedge-fund manager, who runs Appaloosa Management, told CNBC in a phone interview on Tuesday that the market's record run, notwithstanding la

  4. Opalesque Exclusive: Altegris and Artivest partner on distribution for alternative funds suite[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: California-based investment firm Altegris has partnered with New York-based alternative investments platform Artivest on distribution for $1 billion in alternative funds. The partnership also launches Artivest's capabilities to offer alternative solutions to acc

  5. Investing - Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway will not increase its Oncor offer, Travel-tilting hedge funds are investing in airlines and online travel agencies[more]

    Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway will not increase its Oncor offer From Reuters.com: The energy unit of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc said on Wednesday it will "stand firm" on its $9 billion offer to acquire 80 percent of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC and will not increase it