Sat, Oct 19, 2019
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Opalesque Futures Intelligence

The shortfalls of Venture Capital: Why VC has to become a scientific investment discipline

Thursday, November 21, 2013

By John Bhakdi

When we think about Venture Capital (VC), we think about great entrepreneurs, secret deals, and the adrenaline rush of hitting the "next big thing". Silicon Valley is in many respects the financial cousin of Hollywood: full of great successes, grand failures, of divas, heroes and villains. Financially not very pleasing, but a fun sport.

John Bhakdi operates a venture capital fund that utilizes an algorithmic method to make allocations.

But there is a new way of doing business in VC: an approach that uses advanced analytical science and algorithmic investment principles to assist in making funding decisions to remove risk, and give investors much more structured exposure to the world's most promising asset class.
But before I jump into the details, I have to make one important point: The reason we developed a scientific investment approach to VC is not that we have a general bias towards scientific investment in the first place.

"There is a new way of doing business in VC: an approach that uses advanced analytical science and algorithmic investment principles to assist in making funding decisions..."

We developed the i2X quantitative VC framework and the corresponding Innovation Index because we realized that the financing of innovation is a very special challenge.

The factors that determine the success of any individual early stage technology startups often lie far outside the company and even the founders themselves. They can found not by looking at just the company, but only by factoring in a much larger set of factors that we call "ecosystem".
And even after factoring these ecosystems in, it remains impossible to predict an individual startup's success for logical reasons. Therefore, we have to look at a larger set of startups - a "cluster" - and start looking this cluster an investment object. Only then do we get into a territory that offers statistical significance.

This new quantitative approach to VC is personally important to me. It applies the tools of scientific investing to solve probably the biggest problem in global asset management, which I describe as a lack of alpha.

As Ray Dalio once famously said: "In the long run, income can never grow faster than productivity." And productivity is a simple function of technology innovation whose largest growth comes from technology startups.

Since VC is in charge of financing innovation, it is not just a fun sport. It is the financial infrastructure that is responsible to generate growth across all asset classes.

And right now, it's a grandiose failure. At a $26b US volume, dismal returns of 6.9% p.a. - a negative alpha of 2.8% below the Russell 2000 - no liquidity and 30%+ risk, the numbers look not good.

The reason lies in an outdated approach to VC in that Venture firms simply apply the Private Equity playbook to technology startups: they look into their financials, their growth rate, their past. But this is not how innovation works. Truly disruptive startups have no past: they are new. Startups are future potential that unravels far too fast to wait for it to unravel before you invest.

By failing to provide a financial infrastructure that is built around the fundamental traits of innovation, VC fails to build the startup breeding ground our entrepreneurs, financial markets and economy rely on.

This failure and its negative effects have driven us to take action, and develop a financial technology that accounts for the unique nature of startup innovation.

Following this logic, I want to start the description of the i2X Innovation Index and quantitative VC framework by taking a closer look at the system of innovation it empowers. It is a system of four macro-factors which together form a wonderful mechanic of progress that we call the "Innovation Machine".

To read the full article click here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

John is CEO of i2X, the Innovation Index and Exchange. i2X offers targeted, highly risk-mitigated exposure to a scientifically designed index of the best US technology startups. John combines personal startup experience with an extensive track record as corporate executive with a focus on unlocking innovation potential across sectors and organizations. During his career, he has worked with C- and VP-level executives at WPP and Omnicom agencies, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, MasterCard,Ebay, McDonald's, Dow Jones, Microsoft as well as top-tier Silicon Valley VC firms. John is a thought leader on innovation ecosystems, lean startup culture and scientific investment methodologies in Venture Capital.



 
This article was published in Opalesque Futures Intelligence.
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Opalesque Futures Intelligence
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. These hedge funds do better. So why can't they raise more money?[more]

    From Institutional Investor: It's an enduring paradox: hedge funds run by women and minorities outperform their peers - but run less money. Evidence continues to mount that the money investors allocate to minority- and women-controlled hedge funds stands a better than even chance of outperformi

  2. Tech: Quantum computing may be closer than expected with 'game changer' discovery[more]

    From Inverse: While quantum computing has long been an exciting notion for scientists and the public alike, the realization of these technologists has long been on hold. But researchers from the Johns Hopkins University have discovered a material that might just fast-track the creation of these, unt

  3. PE/VC: Private-equity deals depress worker wages, study finds, Thoma Bravo to buy Sophos for $3.9bn, Unicorn valuations are fit to burst, warn investors[more]

    Private-equity deals depress worker wages, study finds From Market Watch: Private-equity deals result in worse pay for workers, and, depending on whether the buyout target was public or not, fewer jobs, according to a newly published study. The study of some 6,000 private-equity de

  4. Tech: When AI invests in AI[more]

    From Forbes: The title of this article might sound farfetched to many readers, but keen students of artificial intelligence (AI) know that this is no longer very far away. Since the advent of computers, capital markets have always been at the forefront of technology. Yes, that's right. You may be wo

  5. Institutional investors in Canada, U.S., and the U.K are warming to responsible investing, says a survey[more]

    Laxman Pai, Opalesque Asia: The use of environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles by institutional investors in Canada, the US, and the UK is rising according to a new survey. RBC Global Asset Management (RBC GAM)'s annual survey on responsible investing trends found that more