Mon, Nov 30, 2015
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

UK industry bodies write to MEPs ahead of Monday’s vote on AIFM directive, appealing for ‘pragmatic and workable solution’

Friday, May 14, 2010
Opalesque Industry Update – Below is the letter dated 12th May 2010, sent by the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), the Investment Management Association (IMA) and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) to MEPs on the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee (ECON), ahead of next Monday’s vote.

“We are writing to you on behalf of the Investment Management Association (IMA), the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) regarding the upcoming vote in the Economic and Monetary Affairs committee on the draft report on the AIFM proposal. We appeal to you to support a pragmatic and workable solution on non-EU alternative investment funds and fund managers (the so-called ‘third country’ issue.)

“Compromise amendment “N” (on Articles 35, 35a and 39) is, we fear, unworkable. In practice, it will not provide access for non-EU funds and fund managers, but will instead ban European investors from investing overseas. It will reduce choice and drive down returns for pension funds and other investors, as they will no longer be able to select their investments from among the best available products globally. This will undermine Europe’s competitiveness. There is a real risk that it would provoke retaliatory action in non-EU jurisdictions, which would damage the European financial services industry and the whole European economy.

“There is no contradiction between setting criteria for some funds and fund managers to avail themselves of a ‘passport’ for cross-border marketing and maintaining Member State discretion on which non-EU funds may be marketed to qualified investors. In fact, this approach has already been supported by the Legal Affairs committee in its Opinion on the proposal and is supported by the European Council. It is the only pragmatic and workable solution on the third country issue.

We encourage Members to vote against Compromise Amendment “N”, or at least abstain from the vote on this amendment. Instead, we recommend voting in favour of Amendments 1454 (submitted by Mr. Balz), 1455, 1509, 1514 and 1517 (submitted by Ms. Wortmann-Kool). These amendments would provide real protection to investors, while delivering the ‘passport’ for eligible funds and fund managers and maintaining national discretion on access to national markets for non-EU funds and non-EU fund managers.”

Richard Saunders, CEO, IMA
Nigel Peaple, Director of Policy, NAPF
Andrew Baker CEO, AIMA


What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Other Voices: Hedge fund marketing and the selling cycle[more]

    By Bruce Frumerman. How long is the selling cycle now? That’s a question my financial communications and sales marketing consulting firm has been asked on a regular basis by hedge fund firm owners and sales people, ever since we opened the doors to our firm in 1987 pre-crash. Wa

  2. People - Solus Alternative Asset Management adds chief strategist from BTIG[more]

    From Daniel Greenhaus joined hedge fund manager Solus Alternative Asset Management as managing director and chief strategist. He will work closely with Chris Bondy, Solus’ chief economist, managing director and executive vice president, said Chris Pucillo, CEO and chief investmen

  3. Opalesque Roundtable: Seeding deal terms can be onerous for hedge funds[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva for New Managers: Executives from fund of funds firms, family offices, a placement agent, a private equity firm, and an accounting firm gathered in Connecticut last month for the

  4. Opalesque Roundtable: Family offices flock to co-investment[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: Co-investments have been a hot topic for pension funds in recent years, as they try to move away from high fees and improve transparency. But now, family offices are more readily getting into the mix and establishing in-house deal teams, according to the delega

  5. More institutional investors invest in CTAs compared to last year despite dissatisfaction with performance[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: "Despite a strong start to 2015 for CTAs in Q1, commodity market conditions have made return generation difficult for fund managers over much of the rest of the year to date," says Preqin’s November