Sat, Apr 18, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Cerulli: Predictable returns highly prized among fund selectors

Friday, November 02, 2012
Opalesque Industry Update - Tough market conditions require complex fund analysis and more exacting manager reviews. Fund selectors still have a long-term outlook for fund assessment, but they want to see predictable returns and solid risk controls, according to the November issue of The Cerulli Edge-Global Edition.

A Cerulli survey of European fund selectors shows that key selection criteria generally play to the advantage of larger players--particularly those attached to major life insurance or defined contribution platforms, but there are notable market differences. Consistent performance and risk controls are highly prized in the United Kingdom and Spain, whereas brand and stability of the parent group are key criteria in France. According to the survey, the United Kingdom is the only market wherefees appeared in selectors' top three selection criteria.

Performance is also a key selection criterion among Asian fund selectors, but brand is ahead of long-term track record and risk controls, according to Cerulli's 2012 Asian fund selector survey.

In the U.S. subadvisory space, perception that a sponsor hires "best-of-breed" managers is crucial. Brand is less important for subadvisor selection as it is the sponsor's brand and distribution capabilities that matter most.

"More than ever, selectors want funds to be predictable," said Barbara Wall, a director at Cerulli Associates. "They do not want cyclical managers to suddenly become value orientated. They want to know how a fund will perform in a given market environment. This means varying the time periods over which they examine fund performance. Also, as part of this, portfolios are reviewed more frequently."

"If anything, the market for generalist funds is diminishing and selectors are becoming narrower in their choice of funds," commented Yoon Ng, a Cerulli associate director.

Underperformance was cited as the main reason to axe a fund in Europe and Asia, though Asian selectors were less concerned by a change of investment strategy than their European counterparts. Asian institutions usually evaluate managers on an annual basis, but may choose not to see out a contract if a manager underperforms consistently. Cerulli has heard of Korean funds being axed after a quarter's unsatisfactory performance, although these are rare cases.

Generally, U.S. sponsors Cerulli surveyed will give an underperforming manager the benefit of the doubt over a "full market cycle", which typically lasts three years. However, underperformance combined with style drift will not be tolerated and could lead to a firing decision in as little as 18 months.

Other findings:

• U.K. fund selectors are most likely to have a large proportion of their assets managed externally. Approximately 15% of U.K. respondents said that 70% of assets were managed by third parties. Fund selectors from Italy and France are far more likely to have fewer assets managed externally. Nearly half of French respondents and more than four in 10 German respondents had less than 10% of their assets managed by third parties. This is expected to change as more specialized mandates are requested from clients.

• Large Asian institutions increasingly prefer partnerships where all partners have significant assets at stake and participate as co-owners. They seek an alignment of interests from external managers. Managers also have to deal with institutions that sometimes set unrealistically high returns that are not commensurate with the level of risk they are prepared to take.

Press release

These findings and more are from The Cerulli Edge: Global Edition, November 2012 issue.

CLICK HERE to request a press copy of this research .

Bg

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Tiger Global falls 2.9% in March, down 5.3% in Q1[more]

    From Reuters.com: Investment firm Tiger Global Management, one of the hedge fund industry's most closely watched players, told clients that its hedge fund lost 5.3 percent during the first quarter, an investor said on Wednesday. Much of the decline came in March when the fund lost 2.9 percent,

  2. It’s not just hedge funds—IMF study finds stability risks from ‘vanilla’ funds[more]

    From MarketWatch.com: Leveraged hedge funds and banklike money-market funds are the parts of the asset-management industry most associated with risks to financial stability. But a report from the International Monetary Fund suggests that “plain-vanilla” mutual funds and exchange-traded funds also ca

  3. Hedge funds gain 2.4% in Q1 driven by currency and commodity markets[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds posted positive results last March to conclude a strong first quarter, with performance driven by strong macro trends in currency and commodity markets, complemented by broad-based gains and positioning in event driven, equity hedge and fixed income-b

  4. Hedge funds looking to continue their rally in Q2[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds finished the first quarter on a strong note and are looking to continue the rally in the second quarter, said Lyxor Asset Management in its Weekly Brief. The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index is up 0.4% over the week

  5. Hedge funds down -0.17% in March (+1.23%YTD)[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The hedge fund industry produced an aggregate return of –0.17% in March to end Q1 2015 up 1.23%, compared to the S&P 500 which increased 0.96%, according to the latest data from eVestment. Hedge fund performance returns were mixed in March amid increased equity

 

banner