Wed, Aug 24, 2016
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Greenwich Associates finds little movement in advance of central clearing rules

Monday, March 19, 2012
Opalesque Industry Update - Greenwich Associates reports that investors in Europe and the United States are on notice that they will eventually be required to execute OTC derivatives trades through centrally cleared transactions. As of late 2011, however, most investors in these markets had not moved to change trading practices to accommo­date the incoming rules.

From 2010 to 2011 OTC derivatives investors executed 81% of transaction volume through bilateral OTC contracts and 19% through centrally cleared OTC contracts. Although central clearing rules are moving toward implementation, 60% of these investors have no plans to change the share of their business conducted through centrally cleared trades. In fact, while 31% of investors plan to increase the share of their business executed through centrally cleared contracts, another 9% plan to reduce that amount.

“Real money” investors make the most use of bilateral contracts, with banks, fund managers and pension funds all conducting about 95% of their OTC derivatives trading volume in commodities through bilateral contracts. Hedge funds, by contrast, execute the highest share of their OTC transaction volume through centrally cleared trades at 61%.

The results of the Greenwich Associates 2012 Commodities Investors Study show a majority of investors have no plans to change trading practices in the next year in markets in which central clearing will be required. In the United States, 52% of investors do not plan to change the share of business done through centrally cleared trades. In Europe 71% of investors have no plans to change.

Standing Pat

There are several reasons that investors are standing pat for now. Primarily, there is still considerable uncer­tainty about how and when new derivatives rules will be implemented in both the United States and Europe, and as such, it might not make practical or economic sense to adjust trading practices until the regulations are set in stone. Investors might be sticking with existing trading practices for as long as they can, awaiting the announce­ment of an implementation date to revise.

“Many investors simply haven’t had the information or the time to work out the precise impact of the new rules on their trading businesses,” says Greenwich Associates consultant Woody Canaday. “Most will at some point sit down to assess the impact and then move to comply. But there will be some number, including many with relatively small positions, who look at the consequences of central clearing and other rules, such as potential position limits, and decide to exit a market that may become less econom­ically attractive.”

SEFs and OTFs Will Reduce Market Liquidity

OTC derivatives users are not optimistic about the direct effect new regulations will have on market liquidity. In both the United States and Europe, regulators are mov­ing to adopt rules promoting the use of Swap Execution Facilities (SEFs) or Organized Trading Facilities (OTFs) in OTC derivatives markets. Forty-four percent of OTC derivatives investors worldwide and more than half in Europe expect SEFs/OTFs to have a negative impact on market liquidity. Fund managers and pension funds are the most pessimistic investors, with more than 50% predicting a reduction in liquidity as a result of the move to SEFs and OTFs. Among banks and hedge funds, more than one-third of investors expect the ruling to have a negative impact on liquidity. Globally, 48% of OTC derivatives investors think the new rule will have no impact on market liquidity and 8% think it will enhance market liquidity.

Recommendations for Investors

The upshot of these findings: Due in large part to the lack of clarity and certainty surrounding new derivatives rules in the United States and Europe, most investors are not taking steps to prepare for a shift to centrally cleared trades. As a result, the actual implementation of man­dated central clearing could cause significant disruptions to OTC derivatives trading as investors rush to change long-established trading procedures in order to comply. While such disruptions would likely be minimal among hedge funds, many of which are already posting margins on their OTC derivatives trades, other investors will have to put aside cash to meet margin requirements and make other meaningful adjustments to their trading operations.

Based on these conclusions, Greenwich Associates recom­mends OTC derivatives investors should immediately begin assessing the economic and logistical impacts of an eventual switch to centrally cleared transactions on their own investment processes and, building on those findings, start putting in place plans for a transition to a workable new trading mix. For their part, regulators should take the industry’s lack of preparation into account when setting final implementation dates. The industry’s lack of action to this point is being driven in large part by uncertainty about the final outcome of the regulations, and rule-makers should give the industry extra time to comply.

Press release

bc

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Opalesque Exclusive: Algorithms platform aims to target typical challenges found in quantitative hedge funds[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Last month, Quantopian received investments from Point72 Ventures, the new venture capital arm of Steven Cohen’s Point72 Asset Management.

  2. LatAm hedge funds surge in 1H to +24.4%, emerging markets assets rise[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds investing in Latin America posted strong gains through mid-2016, reversing declines in four of the past five years, including the last three years, to lead all areas of hedge fund performance through the first half of 2016, according to the latest HFR Em

  3. Opalesque Roundtable: Low and high fee investments often better than mid fee hedge funds[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds that charge the low and high fees stuff often provide better returns than "those sort of mid-fee investments", said Keith Haydon, chief investment officer of Man FRM. (Alternative) investment managers who charge high fees would often provide the most int

  4. Hedge fund investors pull $5.7 billion in July[more]

    From Bloomberg.com: Hedge funds suffered a third consecutive month of outflows in July as investors withdrew $5.7 billion, according to industry tracker Eurekahedge. Redemptions totaled $20.7 billion in the three months through July, with money managers betting on equities suffering $18.4 bill

  5. …And Finally - Police contact Catholic Church after baffling ‘poltergeist’ report[more]

    From Telegraph.co.uk: Police officers in Scotland have called in representatives from the Catholic Church after investigating reports of “disturbing incidents” of a "poltergeist" at a family home. A mother and her teenage son were said to be “extremely distressed” after experiencing what the D