Tue, Apr 24, 2018
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Survey finds alternative ETFs among least efficient at managing tax position

Tuesday, January 03, 2012
Opalesque Industry Update - A report published by IndexUniverse found that US sourced alternative ETFs, based on hedge fund replication, long/short ETFs and other alternative strategies saw nine out of 49 ETFs or 18%, paying capital gains distributions, making them among the least efficient in terms of tax management.

The survey explains that ETFs are designed to be tax efficient. The major part are index funds with low turnover which lends itself to greater tax efficiency than other mutual funds and the design of the ETF’s creation and redemption processes allows most ETFs to continually cleanse their portfolios of positions with embedded capital gains.

The report found that only 84 of the 1,370 ETFs, some 6% of the whole universe, trading in the United States are paying capital gains distributions this year. The numbers include 202 exchange-traded notes.

The survey found that the record for ETFs wasn’t perfect, however, and varied by asset category. Traditional equity ETFs, where just 19 of 756 ETFs paid distributions were among the most successful at managing their tax position.

Fixed income, however, fared far worse. Thirty-seven of 156 fixed-income ETFs paid out distributions, or nearly 24% of all nonleveraged ETFs. The payouts were small—31 of 37 funds paid out gains totaling less than 1% of each of the fund’s net asset value. Nonetheless, the number of payouts was high.

Leveraged and inverse ETFs also saw significant distributions, with 25 of 259 geared ETFs on the market paying out distributions, or 10%.

Currency ETFs and Asset Allocation ETFs, however, were perfect, with zero payouts among a combined 51 funds.

The payouts in bond funds gained particular attention this year.

Of note, all the capital gains distributions reported by the three-biggest U.S. ETF sponsors—iShares, State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Group—were in fixed-income ETFs. Bond funds face various challenges in terms of tax efficiency. For starters, unlike equity ETFs, some use a cash-based redemption mechanism, which generates more internal turnover and can lead the funds to generate capital gains.

According to some experts, the bigger factor this year was market conditions.

IndexUniverse’s data mining also found the divergent story lines from the two major U.S. purveyors of inverse and leveraged funds, ProShares and Direxion. On the one hand, ProShares didn’t report any capital gains distributions in 2011. That in itself is noteworthy, as any fund prospectus from either ProShares or Direxion clearly warns that the turnover required by daily-rebalanced portfolios should create a greater likelihood of capital gains distributions.

The report says: “Direxion, however, had payouts in 25 of its 50 leveraged and inverse funds. One important variable may be that Direxion specializes in triple-exposure funds, while ProShares focuses on double-exposure funds. The triple-exposure component may make Direxion’s challenge a bit more significant. The Direxion distributions do include a number of bullish Treasury funds, which dovetails with what Dickson of Vanguard spoke about. But the capital distributions at Direxion also extend to a host of equity investments, including a bull and bear pair of ETFs focused on gold mining companies, which is more of a mystery. In any case, a Direxion official who spoke to IndexUniverse on condition of anonymity stressed that it’s always the company’s aim to minimize such distributions”.

Beverly Chandler

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Investing - Sequoia takes Facebook stake as shares slide in data controversy, $1.4b hedge fund sees intact fundamentals for Facebook, Jim Cramer reveals some 'suggested hedge fund trades' amid the Trump tariffs[more]

    Sequoia takes Facebook stake as shares slide in data controversy From Bloomberg.com: The $4.2 billion Sequoia Fund bought a small position in Facebook Inc. as the stock slid late in the first quarter, investment manager Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb told clients. "The recent controversy enab

  2. Activist Investors - Blue Sky-owned Wild Breads faces uncertain future[more]

    From AFR.com: A Blue Sky private equity investment in artisan-style baker Wild Breads enjoyed multiple valuation upgrades despite losing millions and breaching its lending covenants, accounts lodged with the regulator last week show. Wild Breads lost $2.4 million in 2017, but Blue Sky ascribed a hig

  3. Opalesque Exclusive: Barnegat to close hedge fund to outside investors on weak opportunities[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Bob Treue's Barnegat Fund Management said it is closing its $666m fixed income relative value hedge fund to outside investors. "The negative side to gains in Fixed Income Arbitrage is that unless we find new opportunit

  4. Investing - Hedge fund makes a big bet on malls, British hedge fund manager Odey short UK government bonds on QE bet[more]

    Hedge fund makes a big bet on malls From Barrons.com: The dominant narrative on American shopping malls is that they're dead. Crushed by Amazon.com, many brick-and-mortar retail stores are destined for bankruptcy. And where is the most retail, clustered all together? Malls. From a

  5. Performance - Hedge funds suffer first back-to-back loss in two years, Netflix performance burns hedge fund short sellers, Macro hedge fund up 14.5% in first quarter sees dollar falling, Renaissance Technologies rebounds across hedge funds in March[more]

    Hedge funds suffer first back-to-back loss in two years From Bloomberg.com: Hedge Fund returns sank for a second straight month in March, the first back-to-back loss since the first two months of 2016, as trade wars, tech-sector woes and a Fed rate hike dragged down the S&P 500 from its