Fri, Mar 27, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Advisors' discretionary business to increase from 59% in 2011 to 71% of their assets by 2013

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Scott Smith
Opalesque Industry Update - Cerulli anticipates the percentage of advisors' discretionary business will increase from 59% in 2011 to 71% by 2013. Cerulli attributes the jump to advisors' interest in building their role as discretionary portfolio managers. However, for many advisors, packaged programs may be just the solution to improve efficiency and client performance.

The impact of advisors' preference for discretionary programs has significant implications for broker/dealers.

"Firms must walk a fine line between extolling the virtues of a centralized services approach and respecting the autonomy of advisors to serve investors as they see fit," comments Scott Smith, head of Cerulli's intermediary practice.

From the broker/dealer perspective, advisor use of firm-driven investment solutions offers economies of scale both at the firm and practice levels and has the potential to reduce risk exposure on multiple levels. While advisors generally recognize that outsourcing portfolio construction activities could benefit their practices from an efficiency perspective, there is widespread reluctance among advisors to embrace this approach.

"Our research shows that advisors prefer the freedom of open programs over packaged solutions," comments Patrick Newcomb, senior analyst in Cerulli's managed accounts practice.

"The acceptance of packaged programs by advisors could ultimately be driven by the performance of the programs relative to the advisor's own results. Client management and portfolio management are often not intersecting skills, which would suggest consideration of firm discretionary solutions to focus efforts toward client services. Since advisors are subject to the psychological traps that reduce long-term investor returns, only process-oriented research-focused advisors should consider undertaking discretionary decisions," continues Newcomb.

The results of the limited analysis that has been conducted on advisors' ability to asset allocate has not reflected favorably on advisors' skills. Though packaged equity programs suffered in 2008-2009 due to their largely fixed asset allocations, post-recession performance has been encouraging. Discipline paid off for advisors who remained in platform models throughout 2009 and 2010.

"Advisors have yet to embrace the programs en masse, as there has not been a marked shift back into packaged programs despite their superior comparative performance," continues Smith.

Cerulli's research shows that most providers charge higher expenses for participation in packaged programs, which is a concern for advisors as it means increased client costs or reduced compensation.

"Level fees for firm- and advisor-driven programs create a program-agnostic environment, while avoiding disincentives for the firm-driven packaged solution. While B/Ds may be reluctant to give up additional compensation that can come with packaged programs, they must weigh whether increased efficiency of advisors using firm-driven programs will outweigh the potential incremental revenues foregone under a levelized pricing scheme," concludes Smith.

These findings and more are from The Cerulli Edge: Advisor Edition, 4Q 2011 issue.Source

Press release

bc

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Other Voices: Does the hedge fund industry benefit society?[more]

    This article was authored by Don Steinbrugge, Chairman of Agecroft Partners, a US-based global consulting and third party marketing firm for hedge funds. It is no secret that the hedge fund industry is viewed negatively by a la

  2. Private credit comes into focus for investors[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: As investors look for a way out of the low yield/no yield environment, private credit is becoming an increasingly attractive asset class, according to a white paper from Bayshore Capital Advisors. Private credit has grown steadily since the financial crisis as

  3. Other Voices: The role of diversification in CTA portfolios[more]

    2014 brought a resurgence of managed futures strategies, or CTAs, which performed very well as a whole, outperforming all other hedge fund strategies. However, a closer look reveals that there was a wide range of performance, or return dispersion, across managers. The bottom line? Not all CTAs

  4. Neuberger Berman unit buys 20% stake in activist hedge fund Jana Partners for $2bn[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Neuberger Berman’s unit Dyal Capital Partners bought a 20% stake in activist hedge fund firm Jana Partners worth $2bn, WSJ.com reports. The deal comes as activi

  5. Hedge fund launches fall again, $1bn funds found to outperform even smaller hedge funds[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The number of new hedge fund launches fell again in 2014, the third consecutive year of decline, while fund liquidations saw their first drop since 2010, according to the latest HFR Market Microstructure Industry Report released by industry data provider HFR. Acc

 

banner