Sat, Nov 29, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Jana Partners, pension fund push for changes at McGraw-Hill

Tuesday, August 02, 2011

Harold McGraw III
Opalesque Industry Update – New York-based hedge fund firm Jana Partners LLC, together with Ontario Teachers' Pension Fund are pushing for a corporate overhaul at McGraw-Hill, the educational books publisher and owner of Standard & Poor’s. This very push could eventually lead to the break up of the conglomerate, various media reports said.

In a regulatory filing, Jana Partners said it had discussed with McGraw-Hill “business, corporate structure, operations, management and board composition, strategy and future plans.” The discussions occurred after Jana and Ontario Teachers raised their stakes in the $12.5bn publisher to 5.2%. Jana holds a 2.9% stake, while the pension fund owns 2.3%.

The company’s Chairman and CEO Harold W. McGraw III owns less than 4% of the company, although the company has been seen as a family business for more than 100 years, since it was founded by his great-grandfather. In 1979, the company, under McGraw’s father, was faced with a similar challenge when he was involved in a messy battle with American Express.

A separate report by the New York Times, citing data from FactSet Research, disclosed that McGraw-Hill is the biggest target of investors this year because of its rich history of publishing educational books used from kindergarten to professional education.

Recently, McGraw-Hill announced plans to divest some of its businesses that are not showing profits. Its Standard & Poor’s ratings agency has produced double-digit growth in sales and profit, but the firm’s book publishing business has not been performing.

Douglas Arthur, an analyst at Evercore Partners Inc., told Bloomberg that the New York-based publisher had announced in June that it would sell its broadcasting unit because its growth prospects were not encouraging. Arthur added: “This is a company that has been a mini-conglomerate of information database businesses, none of which are all that related. The education business is capital intensive, low margin and plodding in growth.”

News of the rise in Jana’s and Ontario’s stakes pushed McGraw-Hills’ shares up to $43.51 in late trading, an increase of 5% from Monday’s close at $41.41 per share. Despite the rise in value, McGraw-Hills share were still below its peak of nearly $71 in 2007.

Mounting pressure
A report by Reuters described the latest moves by Jana and Ontario as an added pressure on McGraw-Hills management to overhaul its business. Jason Ware, an equity analyst with Salt Lake City-based Albion Financial Group told Reuters: "This is a kick in the pants. It brings a little higher sense of urgency."

Peter Appert, a Piper Jaffray & Co analyst, commented that McGraw-Hill could imitate the business model of Dun & Bradstreet which spun off major business units when faced with mounting pressures from investors to increase shareholder value. In 2000, Dun & Bradstreet Corp spun off Moody's Corp, a ratings agency and a direct competitor to Standard & Poor's.

Investors often find it difficult to size up the true value of conglomerates because it requires expertise in different industries. Since the 1980s, activist investors have reportedly been raiding.

The New York Times further revealed that representatives of Jana and McGraw-Hill met two weeks ago and that McGraw-Hill is open to all the options laid out on the table. Another round of meeting is scheduled next week with Jana and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension, the report added.

Some insiders are predicting that an agreement to sell off or break up some of McGraw-Hill’s units is in the pipeline. These includes the spin off of profitable financial services such as Standard and Poor’s from the education business that has been on the decline.
Precy Dumlao


Bg

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Unlucky Paulson & Co. rebrands $1.6bn Recovery Fund after 13% drop[more]

    From Businessweek.com: A maturing U.S. economic recovery is prompting Paulson & Co. to change course. The $19 billion hedge fund firm, led by billionaire John Paulson, told investors on a conference call this month that the Paulson Recovery Fund will be renamed Paulson Special Situations Fund on Jan

  2. Opalesque Roundtable: Islamic Finance races ahead with Sukuk, the first managed account platform, and foreign demand[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: A number of developments took place within Islamic finance in the past years, including the launch of a Islamic managed account platform and the further growth of the sukuk space that saw this instrument evolve from being a type of an ABS security that was rarely

  3. Fund Profile - A complex hedge fund strategy works for United Technologies[more]

    From Institutionalinvestor.com: Reports that portable alpha is dead have been greatly exaggerated, as Mark Twain might have phrased it. Another Connecticut Yankee, giant United Technologies Corp., is gearing up to grow its successful, nearly decade-long portable-alpha program. The UTC strategy took

  4. Opalesque Exclusive: The unintended consequences of Basel III[more]

    Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva: Bijesh Amin, co-founder and managing director of Indus Valley Partners (IVP), a technology solutions and services firm focused on the alternative asset management industry, has recently observed

  5. Legal - Six years after AIG takeover, lawsuit reveals another potential buyer[more]

    From Institutional investor.com: When former Treasury secretary Henry (Hank) Paulson Jr. testified in a suit last month about the U.S. government takeover of American International Group, his words were — mostly — numbingly familiar. Explaining the “punitive” terms set for the September 2008 bailout