Fri, Apr 29, 2016
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

Hermitage CEO William Browder summoned for questioning in Moscow by investigator implicated in Magnitsky murder

Thursday, May 12, 2011
Russian Interior Ministry investigator Oleg Silchenko, who was responsible for the false arrest, torture and murder in custody of Hermitage Fund’s lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, has issued a summons to question the CEO of Hermitage Capital Management, William Browder, in Moscow.

The summons came by fax from Silchenko just two days before the date of the intended questioning. Silchenko’s notice was printed on Russian Interior Ministry letterhead and was faxed to Hermitage’s London office on 10 May, inviting William Browder to appear in Moscow two days later on May 12, at 11 am at the Ministry of Interior Investigative Committee: Office 71, 10/2 B Nikitskaya, Moscow, Russian Federation.

“The notice from Silchenko is absurd. Silchenko is well aware that William Browder was banned from entering the Russian Federation on “national security” grounds. Silchenko is clearly retaliating against Mr Browder’s global campaign to get justice for Sergei Magnitsky and efforts to introduce sanctions against Silchenko and other Russian officials who played a role in Sergei’s, torture and death,” said a Hermitage Capital representative.

Silchenko faxed three copies of the same summons, one after the other, at the same time, changing the date on each fax header, to make it appear that they were sent at different dates and times. However, the receipt details from the faxes all show that they were sent on the same day and within minutes of each other.

The notice states Silchenko’s intention to give to Mr Browder the text of an “accusation” and to question Mr Browder. However, none of Mr Browder’s Russian lawyers have been notified of this action in breach of Russian law, which requires the investigator to advise lawyers of any such summons. In his summons, Silchenko has also ignored the Russian legal norms stipulated for questioning UK nationals through the Russian / UK mutual legal assistance treaties.

“The fact that the summons from Moscow to London was sent by fax and with only two days notice, is simply laughable. Silchenko keeps demonstrating his incompetence and inability to work within the law. If Silchenko has any legal questions, we would be delighted to see him in London where we have some legal questions of our own for him,” said a Hermitage Capital representative.

Last week, Silchenko also issued an arrest warrant for another Hermitage Capital executive, Ivan Cherkasov. It is being appealed by Mr Cherkasov’s lawyers as politically motivated, retaliatory and illegitimate.

Silchenko has become famous across Russia and the world for his role in the torture of Mr Magnitsky which included: falsifying evidence, denying him medical care, withholding food and clean water and forbidding him access to his family. These actions were taken in an attempt to force Mr. Magnitsky to retract his testimonies against corrupt Russian officials who he had accused of misappropriating three Hermitage Fund companies, and embezzling $230 million of public taxes. Based on complaints filed by Mr Magnitsky, Silchenko also tried to pressure Mr. Magnitsky to sign a false confession to implicate himself as well as his client, Mr Browder. Three days before his death, Mr. Magnitsky filed a complaint with the courts stating his determination to bring Silchenko, and other officials who falsified his case, to trial.

Since Sergei Magnitsky’s death in custody a year and a half ago, the Moscow Helsinki Group, an independent Russian human rights organisation, has filed criminal complaints against Silchenko for his role in the false arrest, torture and murder of Mr Magnitsky and the cover up of government officials exposed by Magnitsky in corruption.

Last year, Silchenko also falsified evidence against another of Hermitage’s Russian lawyers, Alexander Antipov, in an attempt to arrest him and have him disbarred. These actions were publicly condemned by the Moscow Bar Association.

Last month, members of the Russian president’s Human Rights Council released part of their findings on the Magnitsky case which stated that Mr. Magnitsky was imprisoned by Silchenko on false grounds and that the Interior Ministry and the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), had fabricated the case against him. This is the same case for which Mr Browder is being sought for questioning today.

In spite of Oleg Silchenko’s public record and involvement in the death of Sergei Magnitsky, last year Russian authorities promoted Silchenko and gave him top state honours on the one year anniversary of Sergei Magnitsky’s death.

In 2009, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe concluded in their report on ‘Allegations of Politically-Motivated Abuses of the Criminal Justice System in Council of Europe Members States’, that:

“the proceedings in the Russian Federation against Hermitage executives and lawyers were politically motivated and as such, any request from Russia for mutual legal assistance must be rejected as being contrary to the established legal norms”.

Silchenko’s notice comes weeks after the Swiss General Prosecutor opened, on application from Hermitage Capital, an investigation into money laundering by Russian government officials and their families. These officials were implicated in the theft of Hermitage Fund’s investment companies and $230 million stolen from public funds – crimes uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky and which investigator Silchenko played a key role in concealing.

Source

See our Opalesque BACKSTAGE Video - Bill Browder: Sergey Magnitsky case reveals Russia's ugliest face here: Source

kb

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Hedge funds see $14.3bn outflows in Q1, CTAs and multi-strategy lead net inflows[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: The hedge fund industry saw net outflows of investor capital in the first quarter of the year, totaling $14.3bn, data from Preqin showed. This continues from the $8.9bn overall net outflows that funds recorded in Q4

  2. Performance - Blackstone profits plunge 77% as performance fees dive, Hedge fund stars' fortunes hostage to market swings, Hedge fund manager goes from billionaire to millionaire in profits plunge, Hedge funds biggest losers in SunEdison's 'magic money machine'[more]

    Blackstone profits plunge 77% as performance fees dive From FT.com: Blackstone, the world’s biggest manager of alternative investments from private equity to real estate, suffered from sharply lower performance fees amid turbulent markets in the first three months of the year, even as it

  3. Third Point calls Q1 "catastrophic" for hedge funds[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The first quarter of this year was rocky for hedge funds based on aggregate performance from the industry, but now we are beginning to hear what the managers thought of it as quarterly letters make their way to investors. Dan Loeb, CEO of New York-based $17 bill

  4. Asia - Stabilization of China's capital outflows may hinge on Janet Yellen, Fink says China to do well this year as bubble threat postponed, Chinese hedge fund to invest in India’s infrastructure[more]

    Stabilization of China's capital outflows may hinge on Janet Yellen From Bloomberg.com: Whether China’s recent stabilization of its currency and capital outflows continues -- or downside pressure reignites -- may hinge in large part on Janet Yellen. If the Federal Reserve chair sticks to

  5. …And Finally - After all, judges are human too[more]

    From Newsoftheweird.com: In March, one District of Columbia government administrative law judge was charged with misdemeanor assault on another. Judge Sharon Goodie said she wanted to give Judge Joan Davenport some files, but Davenport, in her office, would not answer the door. Goodie said once the