Fri, Jul 25, 2014
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Industry Updates

EDHEC Risk Institute: Without the use of robust estimators, minimising extreme risks may be worse than not minimising them

Thursday, October 14, 2010
Opalesque Industry Update - In recent research on advanced modelling for alternative investments*, supported by Newedge Prime Brokerage, EDHEC Risk Institute analysed whether portfolio selection techniques with a focus on extreme risks are truly superior to traditional return and risk analysis in situations when risk management matters most.

The results show that in trying to minimise extreme risk and make their risk evaluation more sophisticated, many asset managers increase the number of risk parameters to be estimated, which in turn leads to less robust and less relevant results than if they had stuck with a simple measure of portfolio volatility.

As outlined in the research, one key problem with explicitly introducing a focus on extreme risk in portfolio diversification techniques is that such techniques require estimates not only for variance-covariance parameters, but also for higher-order moments and comoments of the return distribution, the so-called coskewness and cokurtosis parameters, which describe how the portfolio constituents contribute to the overall fat-tailed and asymmetric distribution of the portfolio (skewness refers to the degree to which the distribution is skewed to the left or the right; kurtosis measures the “peakedness” of the distribution; a “fat tail” distribution is tilted towards the extremes). This is a formidable challenge that significantly exacerbates the dimensionality problem already present with mean-variance analysis.

For example, optimising a portfolio which holds twenty assets would require the estimation of 210 variance-covariance parameters, 1,540 skewness-coskewness parameters and 8,855 kurtosis-cokurtosis parameters! Estimating so many parameters based on limited samples will inevitably lead to substantial increases in estimation error for these parameters, which in turn will adversely impact the performance of the portfolio construction technique from an out-of-sample (i.e. real-life) perspective.

The research also suggests that improved risk parameter estimation techniques exist, which are designed to help reduce the number of parameters to estimate by imposing some structure on the estimation problem. These techniques extend estimation techniques that are currently used by asset managers when they estimate covariance matrices to the challenges of estimating coskewness and cokurtosis parameters. When the number of constituents in the portfolio is reasonably small (e.g., in a broad asset allocation context), the use of such improved estimators in extreme risk minimisation may lead to substantial improvements in risk management compared to the use of standard mean-variance techniques. On the other hand, when the number of constituents is large (e.g., in a benchmark portfolio construction process), using even improved estimators is not sufficient to justify the focus on higher-order moments, and mean-variance analysis, while a priori sub-optimal in the presence of non-normally distributed returns, appears as a more robust way of constructing portfolios.

Indeed, while it is only when improved estimators are used that portfolio selection with higher-order moments dominates mean-variance analysis from an out-of-sample perspective, the research shows that the use of these enhanced estimates generates a significant improvement in investors’ welfare.

A copy of a working paper version of “Improved Estimates of Higher-Order Comoments and Implications for Portfolio Selection” can be downloaded by clicking on the following link: Source

(press release)

About EDHEC Risk Institute
EDHEC Risk Institute is part of EDHEC Business School, one of Europe’s leading business schools and a member of the select group of academic institutions worldwide to have earned the triple crown of international accreditations (AACSB, EQUIS, Association of MBAs). Established in 2001, EDHEC Risk Institute has become the premier European centre for financial research and its applications to the industry. In partnership with large financial institutions, its team of 47 permanent professors, engineers and support staff implements six research programmes and ten research chairs focusing on asset allocation and risk management in the traditional and alternative investment universes. The results of the research programmes and chairs are disseminated through the three EDHEC Risk Institute locations in London, Nice and Singapore.

EDHEC Risk Institute validates the academic quality of its output through publications in leading scholarly journals, implements a multifaceted communications policy to inform investors and asset managers on state-of-the-art concepts and techniques, and forms business partnerships to launch innovative products. Its executive education arm helps professionals to upgrade their skills with advanced risk and investment management seminars and degree courses, including the EDHEC Risk Institute PhD in Finance and the EDHEC Risk Institute Executive MSc in Risk and Investment Management. Website: www.edhec-risk.com

- FG

What do you think?

   Use "anonymous" as my name    |   Alert me via email on new comments   |   
Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing
  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Events – AIMA Australian Hedge Fund Forum, Sept. 16, Sydney[more]

    AIMA Australia invite you to join us at our annual Hedge Fund Forum on Tuesday 16th September 2014 at the Sofitel Sydney Wentworth. The AIMA Australian Hedge Fund Forum is a non-profit hedge fund conference organised by the industry for the industry, featuring quality Australian and internation

  2. Opalesque Roundtable: Success in hedge fund marketing not linked to performance, but investor appetite[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Success in marketing a fund is not linked to the performance, but to investor appetite, to the way you can market the fund, and to how much time you can spend to raise assets, said Antoine Rolland, the CEO of incubator and seeding firm

  3. Opalesque Exclusive: Loeb, Grantham cite growing economic concerns in letters[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: Hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb, head of Third Point, and Jeremy Grantham of Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. have both released their quarterly investor letters today. While news is positive on some fronts, and both men see pockets of opportunity, they also h

  4. Investing – Hedge funds expect Netflix earnings to catapult forward, Third Point's Loeb takes stakes in Fibra Uno, YPF, Royal DSM, Lake Capital in talks to back Engine Group[more]

    Hedge funds expect Netflix earnings to catapult forward From Investing.com: Netflix has made major strides forward in 2014 despite ongoing battles with the FCC and cable companies over the issue of net neutrality. The FCC has now received over 500,000 comments from the public on its pend

  5. Hedge fund manager Winton Capital making headway with long-only strategy[more]

    From PIonline.com: North American investors are helping Winton Capital Management Ltd. make progress — albeit slowly — toward its founder's goal of becoming a $100 billion company. The firm's ticket to quadrupling its assets under management is unlikely to be one of its scientifically designed manag