Sun, Jan 17, 2021
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

New research shows sell-side analyst trading ideas can lead to outperformance

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York:

Do sell-side analyst's trade ideas have value? New research from Ohio State University shows that the stock-price impact of analyst trade ideas is at least as large as the impact of stock recommendation, target price, and earnings forecast changes, and that investors following trade ideas can earn significant abnormal returns.

In a working paper, Everett D. Reese Chair of Banking and Monetary Economics René Stulz; Professors Sinan Gokkaya, Xi Liu, and Justin Birru outline the ways in which analyst trade ideas can impact portfolio returns. The authors note that analyst trade ideas differ from fundamental research calls in that they are usually catalyst driven and have shorter-term trading horizons. (The average trade idea expires in 60 days versus a price target which can last for as long as a year.) Trade ideas are also usually issued on days when there aren't predictable events like company announcements or earnings calls. Often trade ideas can follow an over or underreaction to a news event when analysts notice the potential for mispricing that will likely resolve itself over the longterm. For investors that pay close attention to these ideas, trading them can be a source of outperformance.

The authors of the paper analyzed 4,543 trade ideas manually constructed from Thomson Reuters Investext and Thomson Reuters Eikon, identifying buy/sell ideas issued by 688 unique sell-side analysts employed at 77 unique brokerage ho......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SPACs: The SPAC shareholder class action boom is coming, SPACs have a hidden risk that investors need to know about[more]

    The SPAC shareholder class action boom is coming From Reuters: I'm not the first to predict it, but the past few weeks have brought unmistakable signs that shareholder class action firms are homing in on Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, those so-called blank-check entities that g

  2. SPACs: Jeremy Grantham: "SPACs should be illegal", Spacs may fuel European IPO boom, SPAC IPOs surge, The SPAC pop is now a thing: More unicorns getting on board, Paysafe readies $9bn IPO Via SPAC[more]

    Jeremy Grantham: "SPACs should be illegal" Special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) should be illegal, according to Jeremy Grantham, as they escape regulatory oversight and encourage the "most obscene type of investing." Grantham is the co-founder and chief investment strategi

  3. News Briefs: What if data scientists had licenses like lawyers?, Next generation behind family offices' ESG push[more]

    What if data scientists had licenses like lawyers? From Bloomberg: Data scientists, if they're poorly qualified or act irresponsibly, can do at least as much damage as lawyers and doctors. The algorithms they create can ruin lives, aggravate social divisions, even facilitate genocide.

  4. SPACs: SPAC costs are 'far higher' than previously realized, study finds, Jim Cramer recommends profit taking in speculative electric SPAC names.[more]

    SPAC costs are 'far higher' than previously realized, study finds From Institutional Investor: The costs of going public via a special-purpose acquisition company are both "opaque and far higher" than previously recognized, new research shows. SPAC shares tend to drop by one third or

  5. Institutional Investors: Pensions swamped in a sea of negative real rates, Bahrain's pension fund authority faces collapse[more]

    Pensions swamped in a sea of negative real rates From FA Mag: Defined-benefit pension plans were already barely treading water heading into 2020. In the years ahead, the risk is as great as ever that a large swath of them will drown. As the name implies, defined-benefit pensions promis