Sat, Jan 16, 2021
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

High frequency trading may be popular, but players come and go quickly

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York:

High-frequency traders (HFTs) may be exploiting certain advantages in the market, but delegates at the recent Opalesque Singapore Roundtable say that those advantages come at a high cost and few players stick around for long.

"If you factor in everything, the aggregate cost of being connected directly to an exchange is easily about $100,000 a year," explains delegate Steve Knabl, Managing Partner, Swiss Asia Financial Services. That per-exchange price tag can create a hefty cost basis for firms in markets like the US, where there are some 50 exchanges.

The majority of high-frequency traders tend to engage in niche strategies across these exchanges as well, limiting their long-term viability even if a given firm has the cash on hand to support the cost of the trading infrastructure. "Most of the low latency trading firms are also highly vulnerable to any changes in the trading environment," adds Roland Schwinn, CEO, Eurex Clearing Asia. "This can be anything, starting from a change in market patterns to a modification of the exchange’s matching algorithm." These vulnerabilities create a constantly revolving list of HFT's best performers, making it hard to keep track of who is in the market at any given time.

As niche advantages regularly evaporate for high-frequency traders, algorithms constantly ping the market looking for big orders. Once an order is detected, HFT's can engage in front-running or make types of competi......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SPACs: The SPAC shareholder class action boom is coming, SPACs have a hidden risk that investors need to know about[more]

    The SPAC shareholder class action boom is coming From Reuters: I'm not the first to predict it, but the past few weeks have brought unmistakable signs that shareholder class action firms are homing in on Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, those so-called blank-check entities that g

  2. SPACs: Jeremy Grantham: "SPACs should be illegal", Spacs may fuel European IPO boom, SPAC IPOs surge, The SPAC pop is now a thing: More unicorns getting on board, Paysafe readies $9bn IPO Via SPAC[more]

    Jeremy Grantham: "SPACs should be illegal" Special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) should be illegal, according to Jeremy Grantham, as they escape regulatory oversight and encourage the "most obscene type of investing." Grantham is the co-founder and chief investment strategi

  3. News Briefs: What if data scientists had licenses like lawyers?, Next generation behind family offices' ESG push[more]

    What if data scientists had licenses like lawyers? From Bloomberg: Data scientists, if they're poorly qualified or act irresponsibly, can do at least as much damage as lawyers and doctors. The algorithms they create can ruin lives, aggravate social divisions, even facilitate genocide.

  4. SPACs: SPAC costs are 'far higher' than previously realized, study finds, Jim Cramer recommends profit taking in speculative electric SPAC names.[more]

    SPAC costs are 'far higher' than previously realized, study finds From Institutional Investor: The costs of going public via a special-purpose acquisition company are both "opaque and far higher" than previously recognized, new research shows. SPAC shares tend to drop by one third or

  5. Institutional Investors: Pensions swamped in a sea of negative real rates, Bahrain's pension fund authority faces collapse[more]

    Pensions swamped in a sea of negative real rates From FA Mag: Defined-benefit pension plans were already barely treading water heading into 2020. In the years ahead, the risk is as great as ever that a large swath of them will drown. As the name implies, defined-benefit pensions promis