Sat, Apr 18, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

State Street takes the pulse of buy-side firms mandated to clear OTC Derivatives

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York:

Buy-side firms are unprepared for new trading mechanisms, costs and increased complexity in the OTC market according to new research commissioned by State Street Corporation. The findings show that buy-side firms may need to work more proactively with providers meet challenges imposed by regulatory changes. The paper – "From Readiness to Revolution: The Implementation and Impact of Derivatives Clearing Regulatory Reform," explains how firms will have to prepare for swap execution facilities (SEFs), central clearing, collateral management and reporting.

State Street already serves as a futures clearing merchant (FCM) and a SEF. The paper highlights developments across the entire trade life-cycle and includes a roadmap to readiness for Category III firms – those firms that have yet to complete the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) phased implementation of Derivatives clearing.

Changes in the OTC Derivatives requirements have created three types of firms – Categories I, II and III. Category I firms are companies that have completed the transition to mandated clearing. According to the paper, firms that meet this criteria and acted early have had the opportunity to negotiate more advantageous FCM agreements.

Category II firms have also met those requirements but because they were slower to act, found FCMs less willing to negotiate on terms. Category III fi......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Tiger Global falls 2.9% in March, down 5.3% in Q1[more]

    From Reuters.com: Investment firm Tiger Global Management, one of the hedge fund industry's most closely watched players, told clients that its hedge fund lost 5.3 percent during the first quarter, an investor said on Wednesday. Much of the decline came in March when the fund lost 2.9 percent,

  2. It’s not just hedge funds—IMF study finds stability risks from ‘vanilla’ funds[more]

    From MarketWatch.com: Leveraged hedge funds and banklike money-market funds are the parts of the asset-management industry most associated with risks to financial stability. But a report from the International Monetary Fund suggests that “plain-vanilla” mutual funds and exchange-traded funds also ca

  3. Hedge funds gain 2.4% in Q1 driven by currency and commodity markets[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds posted positive results last March to conclude a strong first quarter, with performance driven by strong macro trends in currency and commodity markets, complemented by broad-based gains and positioning in event driven, equity hedge and fixed income-b

  4. Hedge funds looking to continue their rally in Q2[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds finished the first quarter on a strong note and are looking to continue the rally in the second quarter, said Lyxor Asset Management in its Weekly Brief. The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index is up 0.4% over the week

  5. Hedge funds down -0.17% in March (+1.23%YTD)[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The hedge fund industry produced an aggregate return of –0.17% in March to end Q1 2015 up 1.23%, compared to the S&P 500 which increased 0.96%, according to the latest data from eVestment. Hedge fund performance returns were mixed in March amid increased equity

 

banner