Tue, Jan 19, 2021
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

Hedge fund managers must identify their uniqueness now that they can advertise

Thursday, July 11, 2013

amb
Mark Macias
Benedicte Gravrand, Opalesque Geneva:

Now that SEC has lifted the ban on solicitation and advertising, hedge fund managers, who are at a disadvantage since most lack a marketing structure and a strong online presence, need to identify what is unique about their portfolio if they want to be seen by potential investors, a marketing strategist told Opalesque.

Yesterday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission voted to lift a ban on general solicitation and general advertising found in the Securities Act of 1933, and its rules and regulations about certain private issuers including private investment funds and start-up companies.

"In removing these solicitation and advertising restrictions, the SEC fulfilled its obligation under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act), which instructed the SEC to eliminate these prohibitions to help promote economic growth by facilitating easier access to capital through a less burdensome regulatory framework," wrote New York-based law firm Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt yesterday. The JOBS Act was signed into law more than a year ago.

Private investment funds issuers will be allowed to solicit and advertise to a wider group of potential investors and communicate more freely with them. They will however only be able to sell their securities to investors who meet certain eligibility requirements laid down in the Securities Act (e.g. minimum n......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing

 



  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. SPACs: The SPAC shareholder class action boom is coming, SPACs have a hidden risk that investors need to know about[more]

    The SPAC shareholder class action boom is coming From Reuters: I'm not the first to predict it, but the past few weeks have brought unmistakable signs that shareholder class action firms are homing in on Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, those so-called blank-check entities that g

  2. SPACs: Jeremy Grantham: "SPACs should be illegal", Spacs may fuel European IPO boom, SPAC IPOs surge, The SPAC pop is now a thing: More unicorns getting on board, Paysafe readies $9bn IPO Via SPAC[more]

    Jeremy Grantham: "SPACs should be illegal" Special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) should be illegal, according to Jeremy Grantham, as they escape regulatory oversight and encourage the "most obscene type of investing." Grantham is the co-founder and chief investment strategi

  3. News Briefs: What if data scientists had licenses like lawyers?, Next generation behind family offices' ESG push[more]

    What if data scientists had licenses like lawyers? From Bloomberg: Data scientists, if they're poorly qualified or act irresponsibly, can do at least as much damage as lawyers and doctors. The algorithms they create can ruin lives, aggravate social divisions, even facilitate genocide.

  4. SPACs: SPAC costs are 'far higher' than previously realized, study finds, Jim Cramer recommends profit taking in speculative electric SPAC names.[more]

    SPAC costs are 'far higher' than previously realized, study finds From Institutional Investor: The costs of going public via a special-purpose acquisition company are both "opaque and far higher" than previously recognized, new research shows. SPAC shares tend to drop by one third or

  5. Institutional Investors: Pensions swamped in a sea of negative real rates, Bahrain's pension fund authority faces collapse[more]

    Pensions swamped in a sea of negative real rates From FA Mag: Defined-benefit pension plans were already barely treading water heading into 2020. In the years ahead, the risk is as great as ever that a large swath of them will drown. As the name implies, defined-benefit pensions promis