Sat, Apr 18, 2015
A A A
Welcome Guest
Free Trial RSS
Get FREE trial access to our award winning publications
Alternative Market Briefing

Other Voices: Chasing shadows: should hedge funds shadow administrators?

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

This article was provided by Bijesh Amin, Co-Founder/Managing Director at Indus Valley Partners.

To shadow or not to shadow

At least that is the question facing many large hedge funds with assets well above the magical $1bn mark.

The production of a portfolio NAV (Net Asset Value) is the basis upon which investors pay fund managers their performance fees on the one hand and often the basis upon which they give capital to funds on the other. The majority of hedge funds use a Fund Administrator (e.g. Citco, GlobeOp, BNY Mellon etc.) to calculate their NAV and in some cases perform a range of portfolio accounting functions, reconcile their trades, and prepare investor reports.

Investors will often insist on the use of a fund administrator given they can be seen as an impartial 3rd party to value portfolios, and in light of well-documented be a sensible requirement.

However the handing over of such a key metric such as NAV is causing sleepless nights for many funds, particularly those trading illiquid assets (which can be price that can be seen from a Bloomberg terminal or Level 3 assets in valuation parlance). Portfolio managers may be loathe to hand over the basis on which their performance fees are calculated to people who do not trade the asset classes for a living and have probably never been practically or academically trained in the valuation of those assets.

So naturally the question arises that even if an administrator is being used, should a ......................

To view our full article Click here

Today's Exclusives Today's Other Voices More Exclusives
Previous Opalesque Exclusives                                  
More Other Voices
Previous Other Voices                                               
Access Alternative Market Briefing


  • Top Forwarded
  • Top Tracked
  • Top Searched
  1. Tiger Global falls 2.9% in March, down 5.3% in Q1[more]

    From Reuters.com: Investment firm Tiger Global Management, one of the hedge fund industry's most closely watched players, told clients that its hedge fund lost 5.3 percent during the first quarter, an investor said on Wednesday. Much of the decline came in March when the fund lost 2.9 percent,

  2. It’s not just hedge funds—IMF study finds stability risks from ‘vanilla’ funds[more]

    From MarketWatch.com: Leveraged hedge funds and banklike money-market funds are the parts of the asset-management industry most associated with risks to financial stability. But a report from the International Monetary Fund suggests that “plain-vanilla” mutual funds and exchange-traded funds also ca

  3. Hedge funds gain 2.4% in Q1 driven by currency and commodity markets[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds posted positive results last March to conclude a strong first quarter, with performance driven by strong macro trends in currency and commodity markets, complemented by broad-based gains and positioning in event driven, equity hedge and fixed income-b

  4. Hedge funds looking to continue their rally in Q2[more]

    Komfie Manalo, Opalesque Asia: Hedge funds finished the first quarter on a strong note and are looking to continue the rally in the second quarter, said Lyxor Asset Management in its Weekly Brief. The Lyxor Hedge Fund Index is up 0.4% over the week

  5. Hedge funds down -0.17% in March (+1.23%YTD)[more]

    Bailey McCann, Opalesque New York: The hedge fund industry produced an aggregate return of –0.17% in March to end Q1 2015 up 1.23%, compared to the S&P 500 which increased 0.96%, according to the latest data from eVestment. Hedge fund performance returns were mixed in March amid increased equity

 

banner